课题基金 / 基金详情

STABILITY 2: ACL Reconstruction +/- Lateral Tenodesis with Patellar vs. Quad Tendon

STABILITY 2: ACL Reconstruction +/- Lateral Tenodesis with Patellar vs. Quad Tendon
稳定性 2:ACL 重建/- 髌骨外侧肌腱固定术与股四头肌腱固定术
批准号:
10020168
负责人:
JAMES JOHN IRRGANG
金额:
$64.84万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2019
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2019-09-17 至 2025-08-31

项目摘要

项目成果

JAMES JOHN IRRGANG的其他基金

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
Project Summary/Abstract Rationale: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is complicated by high failure rates in young active individuals. Failure of ACLR is associated with limited activity, reduced quality of life, increased socioeconomic costs and higher rates of osteoarthritis (OA). A lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) may provide greater stability to the ACLR; but, its effect on failure rate is unclear and surgery-induced lateral compartment OA is a concern. A meta-analysis suggests that bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts provide better stability compared to a hamstring tendon (HT) grafts, albeit with greater donor site morbidity. Recently, the quadriceps tendon (QT) has become a popular graft choice claiming stability equivocal to BPTB but without donor site morbidity. By evaluating whether one graft is superior at reducing failure rates and minimizing donor site morbidity and by determining whether the addition of an LET contributes to reduced failure, this study (STABILITY 2) addresses NIAMS’ mission to contribute to knowledge related to the treatment and prevention of arthritis and NIH’s mission to enhance health and reduce disability. Specific Aims: 1. To determine if graft type (QT, BPTB or HT) with or without a LET affects the rate of graft failure 2 years after ACLR. 2. To determine if graft type (QT, BPTB or HT) with or without a LET affects patient-reported symptoms, function & QOL, performance-based measures of function and return-to-sports 2 years after ACLR. 3. To determine if graft type (QT, BPTB or HT) with or without LET affects rates of intervention-related donor site morbidity, complications and adverse outcomes 2 years after ACLR. 4. To determine if the addition of a particular graft type (QT, BPTB or HT) with or without a LET is a more cost-effective approach to ACLR. Methods: This study will include 21 sites across the USA, Canada, and Europe and will randomly assign 1200 patients to either QT (+/- LET) or BPTB (+/- LET). Randomization will be stratified by surgeon, sex and the status of the meniscus. Patients will follow a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Outcomes will be assessed over two years postoperative by a blinded evaluator and include failure status, functional performance, patient-reported function, quality of life and return-to-sport; presence of donor site morbidity, lateral joint space narrowing; and costs associated with failure. Data from a previously performed HT+/- LET RCT (STABILITY 1) will be combined with STABILITY 2 data. Analyses will follow intention-to-treat and primarily consist of mixed effects modeling.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
STABILITY 2: ACL Reconstruction +/- Lateral Tenodesis with Patellar vs. Quad Tendon
Knee CAT Study - Validity of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATs
Knee CAT Study - Validity of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATs
Knee CAT Study - Validity of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function CATs
海外基金