Innovators Network-Population factors, Organizational Capacity, Workflow and Resources (INPOWR)

创新者网络-人口因素、组织能力、工作流程和资源（INPOWR）

• 批准号: 10021447
• 负责人: Sarah LeLeiko Cutrona
• 金额: --
• 依托单位: EDITH NOURSE ROGERS MEMORIAL VETERANS HOSPITAL
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2018
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2018-04-01 至 2021-03-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10021447
• 关键词: Boston; Caring; Characteristics; Climate; Collection; Competence; Data; Data Element; Development; Diffusion; Employee; Evaluation; Foundations; Funding; Future; Goals; Group Structure; Interview; Investments; Knowledge; Leadership; Measures; Methods; Motivation; Outcome; Participant; Pathway interactions; Persons; Phase; Population; Recommendation; Reporting; Resources; Seeds; Site; Specialist; Surveys; Time; Training; Typology; Veterans; Work; Workplace; data management; expectation; experience; flexibility; improved; innovation; instrument; meetings; pleasure; programs; response; stem; success; support network

The QUERI/HSR&D centers in Bedford/Boston, Durham, Palo Alto, and Portland jointly submit this proposal titled “Innovators Network-Population factors, Organizational capacity, Workflow and Resources (INPOWR)”. The energy and strength of the Innovators Network stem from the diversity of Network participants and sites nationwide and from the broad range of projects led by front-line employees. To assess impact, therefore, our team must begin by ascertaining the goals and motivations of participants, then use this knowledge to understand how success is defined across these varied settings and projects. Only with this understanding will it be possible to accurately measure impact. Using mixed-methods, our evaluation will answer three questions: 1) Who participates in Innovators Network? 2) Why do they participate? (what are their expectations for impact at the site and project level?) and 3) What is the impact of Innovators Network participation? Within the 33 Innovators Network sites (VA facilities), there can be multiple S-S-S projects. To answer the above three questions, we must perform evaluations at the level of the site and at the level of the projects (within-site). We propose the following Specific Aims: Aim 1 Examine Innovators Network site characteristics and expectations for impact (SITE and PROJECT level). Subaim 1a. Using quantitative analyses, identify organizational factors associated with Network participation (e.g. applying to be a Network site; applying for S-S-S Investment funds). Subaim 1b. Through qualitative interviews with Site Leadership, Innovation Specialists and select project leads, describe site-level experiences with participation in the Network, define expectations for participation and explore in what ways, for whom, and in what contexts expectations for participation were met. Subaim 1c. Develop a Typology of S-S-S project characteristics, expected impacts and recommended metrics. Aim 2. Measure the impact of Innovators Network SITE participation, using mixed- methods. Subaim 2a. Use qualitative data from interviews with Network participants to identify and understand site-level impacts of participation. Subaim 2b. Use existing survey data to identify impacts of site participation on employee experience. Subaim 2c. Develop, pilot and implement a measure of Innovation Climate in Network sites. Aim 3. Measure the impact of Innovators Network PROJECTS, including factors associated with success, sustainability and return on investment (ROI). Subaim 3a. Using Aim1 metrics for success, measure observed vs expected project outcomes Subaim 3b. Use qualitative data from interviews to deepen understanding of project impacts Subaim 3c. Conduct a Return on Investment (ROI) analysis on selected projects. Our Team, led by our Project Coordinating Center (Bedford) is organized around four Expert Groups. This ‘Expert Group’ structure draws on the unique expertise housed at each of our four sites. Quantitative Data Management will be led by Dr. George Jackson (Durham); Quantitative Analysis will be led by Dr. Sarah Cutrona (Bedford); ROI will be led by Dr. Anita Vashi (Palo Alto) and Qualitative Analysis will be led by Dr. Anaïs Tuepker (Portland).

位于贝德福德/波士顿、达勒姆、帕洛阿尔托和波特兰的 QUERI/HSR&D 中心联合提交 该提案题为“创新者网络-人口因素、组织能力、工作流程 和资源（INPOWR）”。创新者网络的活力和力量源于 全国范围内网络参与者和站点的多样性以及所领导的广泛项目 由一线员工。因此，为了评估影响，我们的团队必须首先确定 参与者的目标和动机，然后利用这些知识来理解成功是如何实现的 在这些不同的设置和项目中定义。只有有了这样的认识，才会 可以准确地衡量影响。使用混合方法，我们的评估将回答三个问题 问题： 1) 谁参与创新者网络？ 2）他们为什么参加？ （什么是 他们对现场和项目层面影响的期望？）以及 3） 的影响是什么 创新者网络参与？在 33 个创新者网络站点（VA 设施）内，有 可以是多个 S-S-S 项目。要回答以上三个问题，我们必须 现场级别和项目级别（现场内）的评估。我们建议 以下具体目标： 目标 1 检查创新者网络站点的特征和 对影响的期望（现场和项目级别）。苏拜姆 1a.使用定量分析， 识别与网络参与相关的组织因素（例如申请成为 网站；申请 S-S-S 投资基金）。苏拜姆 1b.通过定性访谈 与现场领导、创新专家和选定的项目负责人一起，描述现场级别 参与网络的经验，定义参与期望并探索 以什么方式、为谁以及在什么情况下满足参与期望。苏拜姆 1c.制定 S-S-S 项目特征、预期影响和建议的类型学 指标。目标 2. 使用混合方式衡量创新者网络 SITE 参与的影响 方法。苏拜姆 2a.使用来自网络参与者访谈的定性数据来识别 并了解参与对现场的影响。苏拜姆 2b.使用现有的调查数据 确定现场参与对员工体验的影响。苏拜姆 2c.开发、试点和 在网络站点中实施创新氛围措施。目标 3. 衡量影响 创新者网络项目，包括与成功、可持续性和 投资回报率（ROI）。苏拜姆 3a。使用 Aim1 衡量成功的指标，衡量观察到的与 预期项目成果 Subaim 3b。使用访谈中的定性数据来深化 了解项目影响 Subaim 3c.进行投资回报 (ROI) 分析 选定的项目。我们的团队由项目协调中心（贝德福德）领导 大约四个专家组。这个“专家组”结构利用了独特的专业知识 位于我们的四个站点中的每一个站点。定量数据管理将由乔治博士领导 杰克逊（达勒姆）；定量分析将由 Sarah Cutrona 博士（贝德福德）领导；投资回报率将是 由 Anita Vashi 博士（帕洛阿尔托）领导，定性分析将由 Anaïs Tuepker 博士领导 （波特兰）。