Pediatric Deep Brain Stimulation: Neuroethics and Decision Making: Training Supplement

儿科深部脑刺激：神经伦理学和决策：培训补充材料

• 批准号: 10030780
• 负责人: Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby
• 金额: $ 16.47万
• 依托单位: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2020
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2020-02-07 至 2021-09-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/10030780
• 关键词: 18 year old; Address; Adult; Attention; Benefits and Risks; Caregivers; Child; Childhood; Clinical; Communication; Complex; Decision Aid; Decision Making; Deep Brain Stimulation; Devices; Dystonia; Epilepsy; Equilibrium; Ethical Issues; Ethics; Family; Gilles de la Tourette syndrome; Goals; Guidelines; International; Intervention; Interview; Knowledge; Mental disorders; Minor; Movement Disorders; Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; Patients; Policies; Process; Publications; Refractory; Research; Resources; Role; Structure; System; Training; improved; medical specialties; neuroethics; neuropsychiatry; neuroregulation; patient oriented; pediatric patients; prevent; psychosocial; risk perception; support tools; tool

Project Summary Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and adaptive DBS systems are currently used in children with dystonia, epilepsy, and Tourette Syndrome, and its use is expanding to other neuropsychiatric conditions. Yet, there is no empirical neuroethics research that focuses on pediatric DBS (pDBS) nor any decision support tools to guide families and clinicians through this difficult decision-making process. DBS in minors (<18 years old) raises challenging ethical issues including the impact of DBS on agency and personal identity in developing minors, proper balance of clinical and psychosocial risks and benefits, responsible surrogate decision making, the role of minors in decision making, and obtaining informed assent from minors. Empirical neuroethics research is necessary to develop informed policies to manage these ethical issues. Decision support tools or “decision aids” (DA) are also critical in this complex clinical context because they have been shown to increase patient understanding of interventions, accuracy of risk perceptions, promote decisions that are more aligned with patients’ values, and improve communication with clinicians. The long-term goal of this research is to develop empirically-informed and ethically-justified management plans and tools for addressing pressing neuroethics issues raised by the clinical use of invasive neuromodulation in minors. We will examine neuroethics issues (Aim 1) and decisional and informational needs of families (Aim 2) by conducting in-depth semi-structured interviews with pDBS stakeholders for a movement disorder (dystonia) and a psychiatric disorder (obsessive-compulsive disorder; OCD). Dystonia is the most common application of pDBS and there is an FDA humanitarian device exemption (HDE) for the use of DBS in minors with refractory dystonia. OCD is currently the only psychiatric disorder for which the FDA has approved the use of DBS under an HDE (for adults) and more than 100,000 children in the U.S. suffer from refractory OCD. We will interview 1) minors who underwent DBS for dystonia, minors for whom DBS for refractory dystonia was offered but declined, minors with refractory dystonia who may be DBS candidates; 2) caregivers of each of the three groups of pediatric patients listed above; and 3) clinicians of pediatric patients with refractory dystonia. We will also interview 1) minors with refractory OCD who could be DBS candidates if it was available, 2) their caregivers, and 3) clinicians with relevant specialties. Finally, we will develop a decision aid (DA) for caregivers considering DBS for dystonia, the most common use of pDBS (Aim 3). This DA will address neuroethics issues (Aim 1) and decisional needs (Aim 2) and will be developed using the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards. This study fills a critical gap by providing key information about the ethical issues and tradeoffs facing families, minors, and clinicians alike when considering pDBS, as well as an important resource for making informed, patient-centered decisions.

项目摘要 深部脑刺激(DBS)和自适应DBS系统目前用于肌张力障碍、癫痫、 和抽动症，它的用途正在扩大到其他神经精神疾病。然而，没有 侧重于儿科DBS(PDB)的经验性神经伦理学研究，也没有任何决策支持工具来指导 家庭和临床医生通过这一艰难的决策过程。星展银行为未成年人(&lt；18岁)加薪 挑战伦理问题，包括星展银行在发展未成年人方面对机构和个人身份的影响， 适当平衡临床和心理社会风险和利益，负责任的代孕决策，角色 在决策中保护未成年人的权利，并获得未成年人的知情同意。经验性神经伦理学研究 有必要制定明智的政策来管理这些道德问题。决策支持工具或“决策” 艾滋病“(DA)在这种复杂的临床环境中也是至关重要的，因为它们已被证明增加了患者 对干预措施的理解、风险感知的准确性，促进决策更加一致 了解患者的价值观，并加强与临床医生的沟通。 这项研究的长期目标是制定经验性的知情和合乎道德的管理计划。 和工具，用于解决因临床使用侵入性神经调节而提出的紧迫的神经伦理学问题 未成年人。我们将研究神经伦理问题(目标1)和家庭的决策和信息需求(目标2)。 通过对PDBS利益相关者进行深入的半结构化访谈，了解运动障碍(肌张力障碍) 和精神障碍(强迫症；强迫症)。肌张力障碍是最常见的应用 PDBS和FDA对难治性未成年人使用DBS的人道主义装置豁免(HDE) 肌张力障碍。强迫症是目前FDA批准使用DBS治疗的唯一一种精神障碍 在美国，HDE(成人)和超过10万名儿童患有难治性强迫症。我们将采访1) 因肌张力障碍接受DBS治疗的未成年人，因顽固性肌张力障碍接受DBS治疗的未成年人，但 拒绝，患有顽固性肌张力障碍的未成年人，他们可能是DBS候选人；2)每个人的照顾者 上述三组儿科患者；3)难治性儿科患者的临床医生 肌张力障碍。我们还将采访患有难治性强迫症的未成年人，如果有的话，他们可能是星展银行的候选人， 2)护理者；3)具有相关专业的临床医生。最后，我们将为以下项目开发决策辅助工具(DA 考虑DBS治疗肌张力障碍的照顾者，这是PDB最常见的用途(目标3)。这位检察官将解决 神经伦理学问题(目标1)和决策需求(目标2)，将根据渥太华决定制定 支持框架和国际患者决策辅助标准。这项研究通过以下方式填补了一个关键空白 提供有关家庭、未成年人和临床医生面临的伦理问题和权衡的关键信息 在考虑PDB时，以及做出知情的、以患者为中心的决策的重要资源。

项目成果

Pressing ethical issues in considering pediatric deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

• DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.388
• 发表时间: 2021-11
• 期刊: Brain stimulation
• 影响因子: 7.7
• 作者: Muñoz KA;Kostick K;Torgerson L;Zuk P;Kalwani L;Sanchez C;Blumenthal-Barby J;Storch EA;Lázaro-Muñoz G
• 通讯作者: Lázaro-Muñoz G

Deep Brain Stimulation for Pediatric Dystonia: Clinicians' Perspectives on the Most Pressing Ethical Challenges.

儿童肌张力障碍的深部脑刺激：临床医生对最紧迫的伦理挑战的看法。

• DOI: 10.1159/000530694
• 发表时间: 2023
• 期刊: Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery
• 影响因子: 1.7
• 作者: Kostick-Quenet,KristinM;Kalwani,Lavina;Torgerson,LauraN;Munoz,Katrina;Sanchez,Clarissa;Storch,EricA;Blumenthal-Barby,JS;Lazáro-Muñoz,Gabriel
• 通讯作者: Lazáro-Muñoz,Gabriel

Testimonial injustice: considering caregivers in paediatric behavioural healthcare.

• DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107937
• 发表时间: 2021-11
• 期刊: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
• 影响因子: 4.1
• 作者: Pham, Michelle Trang;Storch, Eric A.;Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel
• 通讯作者: Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel

Pediatric Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Current State and Ethical Considerations.

• DOI: 10.1017/s0963180120000316
• 发表时间: 2020-10
• 期刊: CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
• 影响因子: 1.8
• 作者: Munoz, Katrina A.;Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer;Storch, Eric A.;Torgerson, Laura;Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel
• 通讯作者: Lazaro-Munoz, Gabriel

Call for moral recognition as part of paediatric assent.

• DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109013
• 发表时间: 2023-07
• 期刊: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
• 影响因子: 4.1
• 作者: Smith, Jared;Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer
• 通讯作者: Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer