Who benefits from Colorectal Cancer Screening? A subgroup Analysis of the Minnes
Who benefits from Colorectal Cancer Screening? A subgroup Analysis of the Minnes
批准号:
7792918
负责人:
Aasma Shaukat
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2009
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2009-10-01 至 2013-09-30
关键词:
Adenomatous PolypsAgeAspirinAttentionBody mass indexCancer ControlCategoriesCause of DeathCharacteristicsClinicalColon CarcinomaColonoscopyColorectal CancerComorbidityConsumptionControlled StudyDataData FilesDatabasesDietDietary FactorsDouble contrast barium enemaEffectivenessElderlyFecal occult bloodFiberFlexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopyGenderGoalsGuidelinesHealthcare SystemsIncidenceIndividualIntakeLesionLife ExpectancyLong-Term EffectsMalignant NeoplasmsMeta-AnalysisMethodsMinnesotaNon-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory AgentsNutritionalOutcomeParticipantPatientsPolypectomyPopulationQuestionnairesRandomizedRandomized Clinical TrialsRandomized Controlled TrialsRecruitment ActivityReportingResearchResearch PersonnelResourcesRiskScreening procedureSpecific qualifier valueSubgroupTarget PopulationsTestingTimeUpdateVeteransVital StatusWomanage groupcolorectal cancer screeningdesignexperiencehealthy volunteerhigh riskimprovedinterestlifestyle factorsmenmortalitypublic health relevance
中文摘要
点击翻译按钮获取中文摘要
英文摘要
DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant):
1. To determine the effect of fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) screening on colorectal cancer mortality, non- colorectal cancer mortality and all-cause mortality in the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study, (MCCCS) updated to 2006 2. To determine the effect of FOBT screening on colorectal cancer mortality and non-colorectal cancer mortality by age (by 5 and 10 year age groups) and gender in the MCCCS updated to 2006 3. To determine the independent influence of baseline characteristics on colorectal cancer mortality and non-colorectal cancer mortality in the MCCCS. Significance: Most guidelines recommend starting screening for colorectal cancer at age 50 years for average risk individuals. The earliest and most tested strategy among these is FOBT, supported by four large randomized clinical trials that established the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. The Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study was conducted in Minnesota, US. The trial recruited healthy volunteers between the ages of 50 to 80. The trials have not reported results stratified by age and gender. Additionally, the effects of other baseline variables, such as co-morbidities and intake of aspirin on outcomes have not been reported. A recent meta-analysis of these trials confirmed a reduction in colorectal cancer mortality (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.8-0.95), but also reported an increase in non-colorectal cancer mortality of approximately equal absolute magnitude (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04) so that overall mortality was nearly identical (RR 1.002, 95% CI 0.989-1.015). Why non-CRC mortality would be increased is unclear, but one possibility is that the FOBT trials included some individuals that benefited from CRC screening, and other individuals who experienced net harm. Therefore, detailed sub-group analyses of the FOBT trial data, to separate out sub- groups that benefit from screening from those who may potentially be harmed would be important. For example, patients over age 70 or 75 might derive less benefit and more harm from screening, in which case screening this population may need to be re-considered. The goals of this research are to evaluate if effects of screening on colorectal cancer mortality seen 18 years after randomization (reported in 1999) in the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study persist, or are different 28-30 years after randomization (when updated to year 2006), and whether effect of screening for colorectal cancer varies in age and gender sub- groups. We also wish to evaluate the influence of baseline characteristics, such as diet, aspirin use and body mass index on these outcomes. Project Design and methods: This project involves updating the vital status and cause of death of all participants from the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study up to 2006 and calculating CRC, non-CRC and all-cause mortality estimates. We plan to compare colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and non-colorectal cancer mortality rates between the screened and unscreened groups, by age categories at time of randomization of 5 year (50-54, 55-59, 60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-80) and 10 year (50-59, 60-69, 70-80) intervals. We will also stratify the above analyses by gender subgroups. No patient baseline data other than age and gender has been analyzed or reported from the Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. A 4-page, 56-item baseline questionnaire was completed by participants. We will perform a quality check on the existing data files to determine if re-entry is required for all or a subset of the questions on the baseline questionnaire. We are interested in exploring the relationship between consumption of NSAIDs, high fiber diet and BMI as effect modifiers of effectiveness of screening.
PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE:
VA has put much effort into studying and implementing colorectal cancer screening. Colorectal cancer incidence increases with age. It is one of the most common cancers among the veteran population. Lieberman et al57 reported an incidence rate of 5.9% for colonic lesions among asymptomatic veterans undergoing screening colonoscopy. An estimated 75% of VA patients are over age 50, and 40% are over age 70. Also, women constitute 5% of veteran patients, and the number is expected is increase. A recent VA study has called attention to CRC screening in elderly veterans with serious co- morbidities who are unlikely to benefit 1. It is therefore important to clarify whether screening is beneficial in all sub-groups. A better understanding of the ideal target population to be screened would help focus efforts at resource-effective implementation.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Reducing Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening through Proactive Outreach and Navigation in federally qualified health care centers in Brooklyn
-
批准号:10649941
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$50.0万
-
财政年份:2023
-
负责人:Aasma Shaukat
-
依托单位:
Who benefits from Colorectal Cancer Screening? A subgroup Analysis of the Minnes
-
批准号:8391076
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2009
-
负责人:Aasma Shaukat
-
依托单位:
Who benefits from Colorectal Cancer Screening? A subgroup Analysis of the Minnes
-
批准号:7912983
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$0.0万
-
财政年份:2009
-
负责人:Aasma Shaukat
-
依托单位:
国内基金
海外基金
登录
查看更多内容
补阳还五汤通过AGE-RAGE通路调控脓毒症免疫失衡的机制与转化研究
-
批准号:JCZRLH202601523
-
项目类别:省市级项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2026
-
负责人:
-
依托单位:
靶向递送一氧化碳调控AGE-RAGE级联反应促进糖尿病创面愈合研究
-
批准号:JCZRQN202500010
-
项目类别:省市级项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2025
-
负责人:
-
依托单位:
对香豆酸抑制AGE-RAGE-Ang-1通路改善海马血管生成障碍发挥抗阿尔兹海默病作用
-
批准号:2025JJ70209
-
项目类别:省市级项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2025
-
负责人:雷芬芳
-
依托单位:
AGE-RAGE通路调控慢性胰腺炎纤维化进程的作用及分子机制
-
批准号:--
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2024
-
负责人:万荣
-
依托单位:
甜茶抑制AGE-RAGE通路增强突触可塑性改善小鼠抑郁样行为
-
批准号:2023JJ50274
-
项目类别:省市级项目
-
资助金额:--
-
批准年份:2023
-
负责人:贺志明
-
依托单位:
蒙药额尔敦-乌日勒基础方调控AGE-RAGE信号通路改善术后认知功能障碍研究
-
批准号:--
-
项目类别:地区科学基金项目
-
资助金额:33万元
-
批准年份:2022
-
负责人:都义日
-
依托单位:
补肾健脾祛瘀方调控AGE/RAGE信号通路在再生障碍性贫血骨髓间充质干细胞功能受损的作用与机制研究
-
批准号:--
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:52万元
-
批准年份:2022
-
负责人:叶宝东
-
依托单位:
LncRNA GAS5在2型糖尿病动脉粥样硬化中对AGE-RAGE 信号通路上相关基因的调控作用及机制研究
-
批准号:
-
项目类别:省市级项目
-
资助金额:10.0万元
-
批准年份:2022
-
负责人:于海兵
-
依托单位:
围绕GLP1-Arginine-AGE/RAGE轴构建探针组学方法探索大柴胡汤异病同治的效应机制
-
批准号:81973577
-
项目类别:面上项目
-
资助金额:55.0万元
-
批准年份:2019
-
负责人:辛贵忠
-
依托单位:
AGE/RAGE通路microRNA编码基因多态性与2型糖尿病并发冠心病的关联研究
-
批准号:81602908
-
项目类别:青年科学基金项目
-
资助金额:18.0万元
-
批准年份:2016
-
负责人:刘括
-
依托单位: