Family Structure, Informal Care and Long-term Care Insurance

家庭结构、非正式护理和长期护理保险

• 批准号: 8212741
• 负责人: Courtney Harold Van Houtven
• 金额: $ 27.44万
• 依托单位: DUKE UNIVERSITY
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2011
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2011-09-27 至 2014-07-31
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8212741
• 关键词: Address; Adult Children; Affect; Age; Altruism; Area; Attitude; Caring; Child; Cost Savings; Crowding; Data; Data Set; Decision Making; Elderly; Expenditure; Family; Family Characteristics; Focus Groups; Future; Gender; Health; Health Policy; Health Services Accessibility; Heterogeneity; Income; Individual; Insurance; Insurance Coverage; Knowledge; Life; Literature; Long-Term Care; Long-Term Care Insurance; Marital Status; Marketing; Measures; Medicaid; Methodology; Methods; Modeling; Morals; Multiple Marriages; Nursing Homes; Ownership; Parents; Pattern; Play; Policies; Poverty; Price; Process; Public Policy; Research; Retirement; Risk; Role; Services; Siblings; Simulate; Solutions; Source; Spouses; System; Taxes; Testing; Time; base; care preference; community living; cost; design; disability; evidence base; expectation; family structure; hazard; human old age (65+); insight; preference; response; uptake; willingness

DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Family Structure, Informal Care, and Long-term Care Insurance Long-term care (LTC) is one of the biggest financial risks facing the elderly today yet very few people-13 percent of current 65 year olds-insure against the risk of self-financing LTC. This lack of insurance coverage has spurred public policy into action, with over half of all States offering tax breaks for private LTC insurance (LTCI) purchases as of 2008. However, LTCI purchases have remained recalcitrant to policy change thus far, with neither substantial increase in coverage nor cost savings to Medicaid. The recent passage of the Community Living and Supported Services Act (CLASS) is the most sweeping change to the LTCI market to date. However, to adequately predict the impact of CLASS, one must understand the causes of low demand, how having LTCI changes one's treatment choices, and how LTCI thus impacts costs to the system. A crucial but notably overlooked factor in existing empirical studies of LTCI purchases has been the influence of family structure and the availability of informal care. It is imperative to understand how LTCI purchases and family structure interact for policy planning, because the presence of potential informal care may make actuarially fairly priced or even subsidized LTCI plans unattractive to many potential buyers. Furthermore, LTCI and family structure may interact in important ways to affect LTC use, costs, and LTCI market expansion efforts. To fill this critical gap in the evidence base, we will use a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. Focus groups with older adults we will explore how familial relationships influence preferences for LTC and market purchases of LTCI. Focus groups with adult children will provide insight on how attitudes and preferences to provide informal care change with a parent's LTCI coverage. In addition to informing the quantitative results, the qualitative approach will allow a heretofore unavailable test of the validity of the assumptions economists commonly make in this area-namely, the existence of interfamily moral hazard, and whether cultural norms, filial piety, desires for independence, or bequest motives dominate. Second, we will explore the effect family structure has on the purchase of long-term care insurance using the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), the only nationally representative data set to include consistent questions on LTCI along with comprehensive and dynamic measures of family structure that reflect modern life. To identify heterogeneity of effects and maximize applicability to LTCI expansion efforts such as CLASS, we will focus on family structure's interactions with wealth, income, and other important attributes. Third, we will use the HRS to examine what effect LTCI has on expectations about and trajectories of long-term care use. We will examine whether LTCI alters time elapsed between onset of disability and use of long-term care by type, the order in which distinct types of LTC are accessed over time, and the duration of time spent in any LTC state. Implications for public LTC costs will be simulated using our results and cost data from the literature. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Inadequate planning for future long-term care needs may limit an individual's options for high quality long-term care. Our study seeks to explain how one's family situation affects planning for long-term care needs in the future, including long-term care insurance purchase decisions and long-term care services use.

描述(由申请人提供)：家庭结构、非正式护理和长期护理保险长期护理(LTC)是当今老年人面临的最大财务风险之一，但很少有人--目前65岁的人中有13%--为自负盈亏的LTC风险提供保险。这种缺乏保险覆盖的情况促使公共政策付诸实施，截至2008年，所有州中有一半以上为购买私人长期保险(LTCI)提供税收减免。然而，到目前为止，LTCI的购买仍然对政策变化持顽固态度，既没有大幅增加覆盖范围，也没有节省医疗补助的成本。最近通过的《社区生活和支持服务法案》(CLASS)是LTCI市场迄今为止最彻底的变化。然而，为了充分预测CLASS的影响，人们必须了解低需求的原因，LTCI如何改变一个人的治疗选择，以及LTCI如何影响系统的成本。在现有的LTCI购买经验研究中，一个关键但明显被忽视的因素是家庭结构和非正式护理的可获得性的影响。必须了解长期保险购买和家庭结构如何相互作用于政策规划，因为潜在的非正式护理的存在可能会使精算公平定价甚至补贴的长期保险计划对许多潜在买家没有吸引力。此外，LTCI和家庭结构可能以重要的方式相互作用，影响LTC的使用、成本和LTCI市场扩张努力。为了填补证据基础中的这一关键空白，我们将使用定性和定量相结合的方法。与老年人的焦点小组，我们将探索家庭关系如何影响对LTC的偏好和市场对LTCI的购买。以成年子女为对象的焦点小组将提供关于提供非正式护理的态度和偏好如何随着父母的LTCI覆盖范围的变化而变化的见解。除了提供定量结果，定性方法还将允许对经济学家在这一领域通常做出的假设的有效性进行迄今无法获得的检验--即家庭间道德风险的存在，以及文化规范、孝道、独立愿望或遗产动机是否占主导地位。其次，我们将使用健康和退休研究(HRS)来探索家庭结构对购买长期护理保险的影响，HRS是唯一具有全国代表性的数据集，包括关于长期护理保险的一致问题，以及反映现代生活的家庭结构的全面和动态衡量标准。为了识别影响的异质性，并最大限度地适用于LTCI扩展努力，如阶级，我们将关注家庭结构与财富、收入和其他重要属性的交互作用。第三，我们将使用HRS来检查LTCI对长期护理使用的预期和轨迹有什么影响。我们将研究LTCI是否会改变从残疾开始到使用长期护理之间经过的时间(按类型)、随时间访问不同类型的LTC的顺序以及处于任何LTC状态的时间持续时间。我们将使用我们的结果和文献中的成本数据来模拟对公共LTC成本的影响。 公共卫生相关性：对未来长期护理需求的规划不足可能会限制个人获得高质量长期护理的选择。我们的研究试图解释一个人的家庭状况如何影响对未来长期护理需求的规划，包括长期护理保险的购买决策和长期护理服务的使用。