Core 1- Administration and Management p. 221

项目概要 为了实现其总体目标，NCQBCS 需要一个科学的领导平台来有效协调 我们的 TR&D、DBP 和 C&S 工作。因此，我们组建了一支互补的教职员工组合 在威斯康星大学工作超过 50 年的科学家。这位技术精湛、知识渊博的 团队将为该中心配备数十年的技术开发专业知识和长期连续性 设施成功运行所必需的。除了开展和领导技术研究部门之外 该中心的背景和专业知识相一致的工作人员必须指导各种科学项目 被设施接受。同样，我们将依靠这一丰富的经验来审查这些项目 定期。最后，我们对拟议的内部执行咨询委员会进行了改组，以组建一个小组 如有必要，每年召开一次临时会议，以处理任何潜在的大学管理问题， 中心投诉、员工问题和共同调查员纠纷。 NCQBCS 的指导将要求 实施各种政策和程序，以提高所有中心的整体效率和效力 活动。例如，这些协议对于分配中心资源、安排项目、 确定工作的优先顺序、接受新的合作和 DBP、安排培训等。推出后 我们将通过网站提供中心的所有政策。这些程序的更新和补充 将根据工作人员和用户的意见确定。这些建议以及所有政策将每年审核一次 NCQBCS 员工会议上的季度。目的是确定是否应该创建新协议或 更新现有政策以满足用户的需求。我们是否应该确定是否需要一项新政策 中心工作人员在场的多数票将成立一个小组委员会来起草该文件，该文件将 在随后的员工会议上进行审查并投票赞成或反对。为了提供关键反馈，我们将招募一名 由具有生物医学、技术和/或领导经验的杰出研究人员组成的小组，为我们服务 外部咨询委员会（EAC）。我们将包括一批具有长期观点的知名科学家 该领域和年轻科学家产生新的想法。委员会的主要作用是坦诚并 至关重要的。年度会议将激励 NCQBCS 的工作人员，因为他们的项目将 进行审查，为明年提供指导。

Project Summary To achieve its overarching aims, the NCQBCS requires a scientific leadership platform to effectively orchestrate our TR&D, DBP, and C&S efforts. Accordingly, we have assembled a complementary mix of faculty and staff scientists with over 50 combined years of service at the University of Wisconsin. This skilled and knowledgeable team will equip the center with decades of technology development expertise and the long-term continuity required for successful operation of the facility. Beyond conducting and leading the technology research arm of the center, staff members with aligning background and expertise must direct the various scientific projects accepted by the facility. Likewise, we will rely upon this tremendous experience to review these projects regularly. Finally, we have revamped the proposed Internal Executive Advisory committee to form a group that meets annually and in an ad hoc manner, if necessary, to deal with any potential University Administration issues, Center complaints, staff issues, and co-Investigator disputes. Guidance of the NCQBCS will require the implementation of various policies and procedures to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness of all Center activities. For example, these protocols will be necessary to allocate Center resources, schedule projects, prioritize work, accept new collaborations and DBPs, and arrange training, among others. Upon launching of the Center we will make available all Center policy through a website. Updates and additions to these procedures will be determined based on staff and user input. These suggestions, and all policies, will be reviewed once per quarter at an NCQBCS staff meeting. The intent is to determine whether new protocols should be created or existing policies updated to meet the needs of our users. Should we determine the need for a new policy, by a majority vote of Center staff present, a sub-committee will be assembled to draft the document, which will be reviewed and voted up or down at the following staff meeting. To provide critical feedback, we shall recruit a panel of prominent researchers with biomedical, technological, and/or leadership experience to serve on our External Advisory Committee (EAC). We will include a mix of established scientists having long-term views of the field and younger scientists generating fresh ideas. The primary role of the committee is to be frank and critical. The yearly meetings will serve as a stimulus to NCQBCS's staff members, as their projects will be reviewed to provide guidance over the next year.