Core 1- Administration and Management p. 221

核心 1 - 行政和管理

• 批准号: 8998781
• 负责人: JOSHUA J COON
• 金额: $ 6.19万
• 依托单位: UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
• 依托单位国家: 美国
• 财政年份: 2016
• 资助国家: 美国
• 起止时间: 2016-07-05 至 2021-06-30
• 项目状态: 已结题
• 来源: https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/8998781
• 关键词: Address; Advisory Committees; Bioinformatics; Biology; Collaborations; Complex; Complex Mixtures; Data Collection; Disputes; Effectiveness; Equipment; Faculty; Feedback; Fractionation; Goals; Group Meetings; Label; Leadership; Maintenance; Methodology; Policies; Preparation; Procedures; Protocols documentation; Recruitment Activity; Research; Research Personnel; Resources; Role; Sampling; Scanning; Schedule; Scientist; Services; Software Engineering; Stimulus; Suggestion; System; Technology; Testing; Training; Universities; Update; Voting; Wisconsin; Work; arm; base; design; experience; frontier; improved; instrumentation; meetings; member; novel; operation; protein purification; repaired; skills; technology development; web site

Project Summary To achieve its overarching aims, the NCQBCS requires a scientific leadership platform to effectively orchestrate our TR&D, DBP, and C&S efforts. Accordingly, we have assembled a complementary mix of faculty and staff scientists with over 50 combined years of service at the University of Wisconsin. This skilled and knowledgeable team will equip the center with decades of technology development expertise and the long-term continuity required for successful operation of the facility. Beyond conducting and leading the technology research arm of the center, staff members with aligning background and expertise must direct the various scientific projects accepted by the facility. Likewise, we will rely upon this tremendous experience to review these projects regularly. Finally, we have revamped the proposed Internal Executive Advisory committee to form a group that meets annually and in an ad hoc manner, if necessary, to deal with any potential University Administration issues, Center complaints, staff issues, and co-Investigator disputes. Guidance of the NCQBCS will require the implementation of various policies and procedures to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness of all Center activities. For example, these protocols will be necessary to allocate Center resources, schedule projects, prioritize work, accept new collaborations and DBPs, and arrange training, among others. Upon launching of the Center we will make available all Center policy through a website. Updates and additions to these procedures will be determined based on staff and user input. These suggestions, and all policies, will be reviewed once per quarter at an NCQBCS staff meeting. The intent is to determine whether new protocols should be created or existing policies updated to meet the needs of our users. Should we determine the need for a new policy, by a majority vote of Center staff present, a sub-committee will be assembled to draft the document, which will be reviewed and voted up or down at the following staff meeting. To provide critical feedback, we shall recruit a panel of prominent researchers with biomedical, technological, and/or leadership experience to serve on our External Advisory Committee (EAC). We will include a mix of established scientists having long-term views of the field and younger scientists generating fresh ideas. The primary role of the committee is to be frank and critical. The yearly meetings will serve as a stimulus to NCQBCS's staff members, as their projects will be reviewed to provide guidance over the next year.

项目摘要 为了实现其总体目标，NCQBCS需要一个科学的领导平台，以有效地协调 我们的TR&D、DBP和C&S工作。因此，我们聚集了一批互补的教职员工， 在威斯康星州大学服务超过50年的科学家。这位技术娴熟、知识渊博的 该团队将为该中心提供数十年的技术开发专业知识和长期的连续性 这是设施成功运行所必需的。除了进行和领导技术研究部门， 在中心，具有一致背景和专业知识的工作人员必须指导各种科学项目 设施接受。同样地，我们亦会凭借这些丰富的经验来检讨这些计划 定期。最后，我们对拟议的内部执行咨询委员会进行了改组，成立了一个小组， 每年举行一次会议，如有必要，以临时方式处理任何潜在的大学行政问题， 中心投诉、工作人员问题和合作研究者争议。NCQBCS的指南将要求 执行各种政策和程序，以提高所有中心的整体效率和效力 活动例如，这些协议对于分配中心资源、安排项目、 优先考虑工作，接受新的合作和DBP，并安排培训等。发射后， 我们将通过网站提供中心的所有政策。对这些程序的更新和补充 将根据工作人员和用户输入确定。这些建议和所有政策将在每个 在NCQBCS员工会议上。目的是确定是否应创建新协议， 更新现有政策，以满足我们用户的需求。我们是否应该通过一个 如果中心工作人员在场的多数票通过，将召集一个小组委员会起草文件， 在下一次员工会议上进行了审查和投票。为了提供批评性反馈，我们将招募一名 具有生物医学，技术和/或领导经验的杰出研究人员组成的小组， 外部咨询委员会（EAC）。我们将包括一个混合的既定科学家有长期的看法， 该领域和年轻科学家产生新的想法。委员会的主要作用是坦率和 很危险每年的会议将作为一个激励NCQBCS的工作人员，因为他们的项目将 为明年提供指导。