Core 1- Administration and Management p. 221

项目摘要 为了实现其总体目标，NCQBCS需要一个科学的领导平台来有效地协调 我们的研发、DBP和C&S的努力。因此，我们组建了一支互补的教职员工队伍。 在威斯康星大学工作超过50年的科学家。这位技术娴熟、学识渊博的 团队将为中心配备数十年的技术开发专业知识和长期的连续性 设施的成功运行所需的。除了领导和领导技术研究部门 该中心、具有一致背景和专业知识的工作人员必须指导各种科学项目 被设施接受。同样，我们将依靠这一巨大的经验来审查这些项目 定期的。最后，我们对拟议的内部执行咨询委员会进行了调整，以组成一个小组， 如有必要，每年以特别方式开会，以处理任何潜在的大学行政问题， 处理投诉、员工问题和合作调查员纠纷。NCQBCS的指导将需要 执行各项政策和程序，以提高所有中心的整体效率和效果 活动。例如，这些协议将是分配中心资源、安排项目、 确定工作的优先顺序，接受新的协作和DBP，以及安排培训等。在启动时 我们将通过网站提供所有中心的保单。对这些程序的更新和补充 将根据工作人员和用户的输入确定。这些建议和所有政策将每隔一年审查一次 季度在NCQBCS的员工会议上。其目的是确定是否应该创建新的协议或 更新现有政策以满足我们用户的需求。我们是否应该通过一项新政策来确定新政策的必要性 中心工作人员多数票出席，将成立一个小组委员会起草文件，这将是 在接下来的员工会议上进行审查并投票通过或否决。为了提供批判性反馈，我们将聘请一名 由具有生物医学、技术和/或领导经验的知名研究人员组成的小组将在我们的 外部咨询委员会(EAC)。我们将包括一批有长期观点的知名科学家 该领域和更年轻的科学家产生了新的想法。委员会的主要作用是坦率和 危急时刻。一年一度的会议将激励NCQBCS的工作人员，因为他们的项目将 审查，以提供下一年的指导。

Project Summary To achieve its overarching aims, the NCQBCS requires a scientific leadership platform to effectively orchestrate our TR&D, DBP, and C&S efforts. Accordingly, we have assembled a complementary mix of faculty and staff scientists with over 50 combined years of service at the University of Wisconsin. This skilled and knowledgeable team will equip the center with decades of technology development expertise and the long-term continuity required for successful operation of the facility. Beyond conducting and leading the technology research arm of the center, staff members with aligning background and expertise must direct the various scientific projects accepted by the facility. Likewise, we will rely upon this tremendous experience to review these projects regularly. Finally, we have revamped the proposed Internal Executive Advisory committee to form a group that meets annually and in an ad hoc manner, if necessary, to deal with any potential University Administration issues, Center complaints, staff issues, and co-Investigator disputes. Guidance of the NCQBCS will require the implementation of various policies and procedures to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness of all Center activities. For example, these protocols will be necessary to allocate Center resources, schedule projects, prioritize work, accept new collaborations and DBPs, and arrange training, among others. Upon launching of the Center we will make available all Center policy through a website. Updates and additions to these procedures will be determined based on staff and user input. These suggestions, and all policies, will be reviewed once per quarter at an NCQBCS staff meeting. The intent is to determine whether new protocols should be created or existing policies updated to meet the needs of our users. Should we determine the need for a new policy, by a majority vote of Center staff present, a sub-committee will be assembled to draft the document, which will be reviewed and voted up or down at the following staff meeting. To provide critical feedback, we shall recruit a panel of prominent researchers with biomedical, technological, and/or leadership experience to serve on our External Advisory Committee (EAC). We will include a mix of established scientists having long-term views of the field and younger scientists generating fresh ideas. The primary role of the committee is to be frank and critical. The yearly meetings will serve as a stimulus to NCQBCS's staff members, as their projects will be reviewed to provide guidance over the next year.