About swift defaults and sophisticated safety nets: A process perspective on fluency’s validity in judgment
About swift defaults and sophisticated safety nets: A process perspective on fluency’s validity in judgment
复制标题
关于快速违约和复杂的安全网：判断流畅性有效性的过程视角
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sabine G. Scholl
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rainer Greifeneder;H. Bless;Sabine G. Scholl
西方社会通常珍视理性思维，但不相信理性思维是可靠的信息基础。与这种感觉适应不良的看法相反，本文认为流畅的体验通常允许有效的判断和决策。对于这个论点，我们重点关注使用判断流畅性的过程，特别是归因和解释的两个过程步骤。我们认为，这两个流程步骤在快速违约的情况下运行，但有复杂的安全网支持。违约和安全网共同促进了有效判断的形成和普遍有效的判断。我们的结论是，在做出判断时，现在是时候更加相信流畅性作为信息了。
Western societies usually cherish rational thought but distrust their feelings as sound basis of information. Contrary to this perception of feelings as being maladaptive, this contribution argues that fl uency experiences generally allow for valid judgments and decision. For this argument, we focus on the processes underlying the use of fl uency in judgment, in particular the two process steps of attribution and interpretation. We argue that these two process steps operate on swift defaults but are backed-up with sophisticated safety nets. Together, defaults and safety-nets allow for both effi cient judgment formation and generally valid judgments. We conclude that it is time to have more faith in fluency as information when forming judgments.
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.14.4.676
发表时间：
1988-10
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Thomas O. Nelson;R. J. Leonesio
通讯作者：
Thomas O. Nelson;R. J. Leonesio
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Kahneman, D;Tversky, A
通讯作者：
Tversky, A
用于预测知觉识别和再学习的知感判断的准确性。
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.113.2.282
发表时间：
1984
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子：
--
作者：
Nelson,TO;Gerler,D;Narens,L
通讯作者：
Narens,L