Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A mathematical modelling analysis.
Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: A mathematical modelling analysis.
复制标题
SARS-CoV-2疫苗的国家内基于年龄的优先顺序,全球分配和公共卫生影响:数学建模分析。
DOI:
10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.002
复制
发表时间:
2021-05-21
期刊:
影响因子:
5.5
通讯作者:
Ghani AC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hogan AB;Winskill P;Watson OJ;Walker PGT;Whittaker C;Baguelin M;Brazeau NF;Charles GD;Gaythorpe KAM;Hamlet A;Knock E;Laydon DJ;Lees JA;Løchen A;Verity R;Whittles LK;Muhib F;Hauck K;Ferguson NM;Ghani AC
The global dose supply of COVID-19 vaccines will be constrained in 2021. Within a country, prioritising doses to protect those at highest mortality risk is efficient. For a 2 billion dose supply in 2021, allocating to countries according to population size is efficient and equitable. The worldwide endeavour to develop safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines has been extraordinary, and vaccination is now underway in many countries. However, the doses available in 2021 are likely to be limited. We extend a mathematical model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission across different country settings to evaluate the public health impact of potential vaccines using WHO-developed target product profiles. We identify optimal vaccine allocation strategies within- and between-countries to maximise averted deaths under constraints on dose supply. We find that the health impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination depends on the cumulative population-level infection incidence when vaccination begins, the duration of natural immunity, the trajectory of the epidemic prior to vaccination, and the level of healthcare available to effectively treat those with disease. Within a country we find that for a limited supply (doses for < 20% of the population) the optimal strategy is to target the elderly. However, with a larger supply, if vaccination can occur while other interventions are maintained, the optimal strategy switches to targeting key transmitters to indirectly protect the vulnerable. As supply increases, vaccines that reduce or block infection have a greater impact than those that prevent disease alone due to the indirect protection provided to high-risk groups. Given a 2 billion global dose supply in 2021, we find that a strategy in which doses are allocated to countries proportional to population size is close to optimal in averting deaths and aligns with the ethical principles agreed in pandemic preparedness planning.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1126/science.abe2803
发表时间:
2020-09-11
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Emanuel EJ;Persad G;Kern A;Buchanan A;Fabre C;Halliday D;Heath J;Herzog L;Leland RJ;Lemango ET;Luna F;McCoy MS;Norheim OF;Ottersen T;Schaefer GO;Tan KC;Wellman CH;Wolff J;Richardson HS
通讯作者:
Richardson HS
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Britton, Tom;Ball, Frank;Trapman, Pieter
通讯作者:
Trapman, Pieter
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa2035389
发表时间:
2021-02-04
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Baden LR;El Sahly HM;Essink B;Kotloff K;Frey S;Novak R;Diemert D;Spector SA;Rouphael N;Creech CB;McGettigan J;Khetan S;Segall N;Solis J;Brosz A;Fierro C;Schwartz H;Neuzil K;Corey L;Gilbert P;Janes H;Follmann D;Marovich M;Mascola J;Polakowski L;Ledgerwood J;Graham BS;Bennett H;Pajon R;Knightly C;Leav B;Deng W;Zhou H;Han S;Ivarsson M;Miller J;Zaks T;COVE Study Group
通讯作者:
COVE Study Group
DOI:
10.1126/science.abe6959
发表时间:
2021-02-26
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bubar KM;Reinholt K;Kissler SM;Lipsitch M;Cobey S;Grad YH;Larremore DB
通讯作者:
Larremore DB
DOI:
10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00057-8
发表时间:
2021-08
期刊:
The Lancet. Infectious diseases
影响因子:
--
作者:
Jentsch PC;Anand M;Bauch CT
通讯作者:
Bauch CT