Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.
Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0022964
复制
发表时间：
2011-07
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
McRae, Ken
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matsuki, Kazunaga;Chow, Tracy;Hare, Mary;Elman, Jeffrey L.;Scheepers, Christoph;McRae, Ken
在一些句子理解理论中，与语言相关的词汇知识（例如选择限制）在其获取和影响的时间过程方面具有特权。我们研究了通过结合多个概念计算的事件知识是否可以迅速影响语言理解，即使在没有违反选择性限制的情况下。具体来说，我们调查了仪器是否可以联合收割机与行动，以影响随后的病人的理解。工具-动词-受事三联体是在一项规范化研究中创建的，旨在直接挖掘事件知识。在自定进度的阅读（实验1）中，当参与者是典型的工具-动作对时（唐娜用洗发水洗，用软管洗），他们能更快地阅读患者名词，如头发。实验2表明，这些结果不是由于直接的仪器-病人的关系。实验3重复实验1使用眼动追踪，观察事件的典型性的影响，在第一个固定和凝视持续时间的病人名词。这项研究表明，基于事件的概念性预期的计算和使用过程中快速和动态的在线语言理解。我们讨论了合理性和可预测性之间的关系及其含义。我们的结论是，选择性限制最好被视为基于事件的概念知识，而不是词汇语法知识。
In some theories of sentence comprehension, linguistically-relevant lexical knowledge such as selectional restrictions is privileged in terms of the time-course of its access and influence. We examined whether event knowledge computed by combining multiple concepts can rapidly influence language understanding even in the absence of selectional restriction violations. Specifically, we investigated whether instruments can combine with actions to influence comprehension of ensuing patients. Instrument-verb-patient triplets were created in a norming study designed to tap directly into event knowledge. In self-paced reading (Experiment 1), participants were faster to read patient nouns such as hair when they were typical of the instrument-action pair (Donna used the shampoo to wash vs. the hose to wash). Experiment 2 showed that these results were not due to direct instrument-patient relations. Experiment 3 replicated Experiment 1 using eyetracking, with effects of event typicality observed in first fixation and gaze durations on the patient noun. This research demonstrates that conceptual event-based expectations are computed and used rapidly and dynamically during on-line language comprehension. We discuss relationships among plausibility and predictability, as well as their implications. We conclude that selectional restrictions may be best considered as event-based conceptual knowledge, rather than lexical-grammatical knowledge.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Hare M;Jones M;Thomson C;Kelly S;McRae K
通讯作者：
McRae K
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.558
发表时间：
1998-05-01
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
McRae, K;Boisvert, S
通讯作者：
Boisvert, S
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
Altmann, GTM;Kamide, Y
通讯作者：
Kamide, Y
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Kamide, Y;Altmann, GTM;Haywood, SL
通讯作者：
Haywood, SL
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
McDonald, SA;Shillcock, RC
通讯作者：
Shillcock, RC