Challenging the White = Neutral Framework in Psychology
Challenging the White = Neutral Framework in Psychology
复制标题
挑战心理学中的白色=中立框架
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
12.6
通讯作者：
Elizabeth Mortenson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Steven O. Roberts;Elizabeth Mortenson
在美国，白色样本经常被描绘成好像他们的种族身份对他们的思想，感情和行为无关紧要，来自白色样本的研究结果经常被描绘成好像它们可以推广到所有人类。我们认为，这些和其他做法植根于“白色=中性”的框架（即，将白色样本概念化为非种族）。首先，我们回顾现有的数据，并提出一些新的数据，以突出白色=中性框架的范围。其次，我们整合了心理科学的研究，认为继续使用白色=中性的框架将阻止心理学成为一门真正客观和包容的科学，原因至少有三个：（a）对白色样本的研究将比对有色人种样本的研究更有价值，（B）保持白色中立的规范将保持不变，（c）白色身份在心理过程中的作用将仍然没有得到充分的说明和研究。第三，我们提供了如何超越白色=中性框架的建议，希望鼓励所有心理科学家走向一个白色=中性框架，在这个框架中，所有样本都被识别为他们带给世界的独特和多样的视角。
In the United States, White samples are often portrayed as if their racial identities were inconsequential to their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and research findings derived from White samples are often portrayed as if they were generalizable to all humans. We argue that these and other practices are rooted in a “White = neutral” framework (i.e., the conceptualization of White samples as nonracial). First, we review existing data and present some new data to highlight the scope of the White = neutral framework. Second, we integrate research from across psychological science to argue that the continued use of the White = neutral framework will prevent psychology from becoming a truly objective and inclusive science for at least three reasons: (a) Research with White samples will be valued over research with samples of color, (b) norms that maintain White neutrality will remain unchallenged, and (c) the role of White identity in psychological processes will remain underspecified and underexamined. Third, we provide recommendations for how to move beyond the White = neutral framework in hopes of encouraging all psychological scientists to move toward a White ≠ neutral framework in which all samples are identified for the unique and diverse perspectives that they bring to the world.
白人孩子长大后可以变成黑人吗？
影响因子：
4
作者：
Roberts,StevenO;Gelman,SusanA
通讯作者：
Gelman,SusanA
社会科学家应该与他们研究的人保持距离还是接触？
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1721167115
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
影响因子：
--
作者：
Nzinga, Kalonji;Rapp, David N.;Leatherwood, Christopher;Easterday, Matthew;Rogers, Leoandra Onnie;Gallagher, Natalie;Medin, Douglas L.
通讯作者：
Medin, Douglas L.