Whether CCS technologies will exacerbate the water crisis in China? —A full life-cycle analysis
Whether CCS technologies will exacerbate the water crisis in China? —A full life-cycle analysis
复制标题
CCS技术是否会加剧中国的水危机?
DOI:
10.1016/j.rser.2020.110374
复制
发表时间:
2020-12
影响因子:
15.9
通讯作者:
Wu Wenjing
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yang Lin;Lv Haodong;Jiang Dalin;Fan Jingli;Zhang Xian;He Weijun;Zhou Jinsheng;Wu Wenjing
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an indispensable technology for achieving emission reduction targets, but it is a resource-intensive process requiring a large amount of water. Based on the full life-cycle analysis, this paper firstly reviews the existing research regarding not only the water withdrawal and consumption for pulverized coal (PC), nature gas combined cycle (NGCC), and integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plants, but also the water production resulting from CO2-enhanced water recovery (CO2-EWR). And then a case study is conducted using the practical data of 35 PC power plants satisfying source-sink matching principle. We found that: (1) CCS can reduce 140 Mt/a CO2emissions with a capture rate of 90%, whereas water withdrawal will increase by 174.9%, and water consumption will increase by 150.5% (without EWR) and 36.9% (with EWR). Obviously, the CO2-EWR can drastically reduce water consumption. (2) Capture process contributes most to the water usage. Particularly, PC with circulating cooling requires plenty of water while the increase rate only doubles with CCS. By contrast, although water withdrawal for PC with air cooling is relatively small, the increase rate expands 9 times due to cooling the high-temperature flue gas during capture process. (3) The annual water withdrawal inOrdos BasinandBohai Bay Basinincreases by 347% and 131%, respectively, while water consumption increases only by 30.1% and 45.6%, respectively. Overall, enhancing the condensate recovery treatment during the capture process and the CO2-EWR during the storage process can be considered to deal with water scarcity challenge.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.12.003
发表时间:
2013-03-01
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Corsten, Marielle;Ramirez, Andrea;Faaij, Andre
通讯作者:
Faaij, Andre
影响因子:
15.9
作者:
Mikulcic Hrvoje;Skov Iva Ridjan;Dominkovic Dominik Franjo;Alwi Sharifah Rafidah Wan;Manan Zainuddin Abdul;Tan Raymond;Duic Neven;Mohamad Siti Nur Hidayah;Wang Xuebin
通讯作者:
Wang Xuebin
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Narjes Nouri;Farhad Balali;A. Nasiri;Hamid Seifoddini;Wilkistar Otieno
通讯作者:
Narjes Nouri;Farhad Balali;A. Nasiri;Hamid Seifoddini;Wilkistar Otieno
DOI:
10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.007
发表时间:
2018-11
期刊:
Energy Procedia
影响因子:
--
作者:
Xin Ma;Xufeng Li;Guodong Yang;Huang Wang;Yujie Diao;Lisha Hu;Hui Zhang;Wei Shao
通讯作者:
Wei Shao
DOI:
10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2013.06.0718
发表时间:
2013-06
期刊:
Advances in Earth Science
影响因子:
--
作者:
Li Qi;Li Guizhen;Zhang Jian;Jia Li;Li Haili
通讯作者:
Li Qi;Li Guizhen;Zhang Jian;Jia Li;Li Haili