Deceptively simple … The "deception-general" ability and the need to put the liar under the spotlight.
Deceptively simple … The "deception-general" ability and the need to put the liar under the spotlight.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fnins.2013.00152
复制
发表时间：
2013-08-29
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Bird G
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wright GR;Berry CJ;Bird G
这篇集中评论扩展了我们的原始论文（你不能骗一个骗子“：互动欺骗任务中欺骗的产生和检测之间的相互作用。Frontiers in Human Neuroscience，6：87）。在那篇论文中，我们介绍了一个新的社会互动，基于实验室的任务，欺骗性互动任务（DeceIT），并用它来衡量个人的说谎能力，他们的能力，检测他人的谎言，和潜在的个体差异措施有助于这些能力。我们发现这两种技能是相关的;更好的说谎者更好的测谎仪（一种“欺骗一般”的能力），这种能力似乎独立于认知（IQ）和情感（EQ）智力。在这里，重点审查格式后，我们概述了原始文件的方法和结果，并评论更多的欺骗，近年来引起了批评基于实验室的实验研究的价值。虽然承认实验范式可能无法重现真实世界欺骗行为的全部复杂性和潜在严重性，但我们认为基于实验室的欺骗范式可以为生态有效的欺骗行为提供有价值的见解。使用的欺骗程序，使欺骗研究在一个互动的环境中，与动机的参与者，重要的是，允许在同一个欺骗性的互动中的说谎者和测谎仪的研究。我们的论点是，通过更全面地解决欺骗问题，将说谎者带到“聚光灯下”，这通常是专门针对测谎仪训练的，我们可以进一步增强我们对欺骗的理解。
This Focused Review expands upon our original paper (You can't kid a kidder": Interaction between production and detection of deception in an interactive deception task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6:87). In that paper we introduced a new socially interactive, laboratory-based task, the Deceptive Interaction Task (DeceIT), and used it to measure individuals' ability to lie, their ability to detect the lies of others, and potential individual difference measures contributing to these abilities. We showed that the two skills were correlated; better liars made better lie detectors (a “deception general” ability) and this ability seemed to be independent of cognitive (IQ) and emotional (EQ) intelligence. Here, following the Focused Review format, we outline the method and results of the original paper and comment more on the value of lab-based experimental studies of deception, which have attracted criticism in recent years. While acknowledging that experimental paradigms may fail to recreate the full complexity and potential seriousness of real-world deceptive behavior, we suggest that lab-based deception paradigms can offer valuable insight into ecologically-valid deceptive behavior. The use of the DeceIT procedure enabled deception to be studied in an interactive setting, with motivated participants, and importantly allowed the study of both the liar and the lie detector within the same deceptive interaction. It is our thesis that by addressing deception more holistically—by bringing the liar into the “spotlight” which is typically trained exclusively on the lie detector—we may further enhance our understanding of deception.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Kashy, DA;DePaulo, BM
通讯作者：
DePaulo, BM
影响因子：
2
作者：
Hakun, J. G.;Ruparel, K.;Langleben, D. D.
通讯作者：
Langleben, D. D.
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Parker, JDA;Taylor, GJ;Bagby, RM
通讯作者：
Bagby, RM
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
DePaulo, BM;Kirkendol, SE;Epstein, JA
通讯作者：
Epstein, JA
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Frank, MG;Ekman, P
通讯作者：
Ekman, P