Bedside analysis of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in the emergency room and intensive care unit - the GlycoNurse study.
Bedside analysis of the sublingual microvascular glycocalyx in the emergency room and intensive care unit - the GlycoNurse study.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/s13049-018-0483-4
复制
发表时间:
2018-02-14
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kümpers P
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rovas A;Lukasz AH;Vink H;Urban M;Sackarnd J;Pavenstädt H;Kümpers P
Deterioration of the endothelial glycocalyx (eGC), a protective carbohydrate-rich layer lining the luminal surface of the endothelium, plays a key role in vascular barrier dysfunction and eventually organ-failure in systemic inflammatory response syndrome and sepsis. Early detection of glycocalyx damage could thus become an important goal in critical care. This study was designed to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of quantitative, real-time glycocalyx measurements performed at bedside in the emergency room (ER) and intensive care unit (ICU). The observational study included 70 patients admitted to the ER or ICU of a university hospital. A physician and the nurse in charge of the patient performed sublingual microcirculatory measurements using sidestream dark field (SDF) imaging. A novel data acquisition and analysis software (GlycoCheck™) was used to analyze the perfused boundary region (PBR), an inverse parameter of endothelial glycocalyx dimensions in vessels with diameters of between 5 and 25 μm. The method showed a good intra-observer reproducibility. Specifically, intraclass correlation coefficient analysis showed an excellent reproducibility between the physician’s measurements (0.77 [CI 95%: 0.52–0.89]). The bias between the two PBRs was − 0.077 ± 0.24 μm. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the PBR values obtained by the nurses when compared to those reported by the physician (regarded as the “gold standard” measurement). Intraclass correlation coefficient analysis showed excellent reproducibility between the nurses’ and physician’s PBRs (0.75 [95% CI: 0.52–0.87]). The mean difference between the two PBRs (i.e., the bias) was 0.007 ± 0.25 μm. The nurses’ PBR assessment had a 90% sensitivity (95% CI: 60–99%) and 90% specificity (95% CI: 80–93%) to identify a severely impaired glycocalyx. Glycocalyx dimensions can be measured at patients’ bedside precisely by non-invasive assessment of the PBR. This assessment could become part of standard monitoring and contribute to clinical decision-making and resuscitation protocols in clinical trials and daily practice. The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0483-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.5
作者:
Reitsma, Sietze;Slaaf, Dick W.;Vink, Hans;van Zandvoort, Marc A. M. J.;Egbrink, Mirjam G. A. oude
通讯作者:
Egbrink, Mirjam G. A. oude
DOI:
10.2215/cjn.08160813
发表时间:
2014-04-07
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Dane, Martijn J. C.;Khairoun, Meriem;Rabelink, Ton J.
通讯作者:
Rabelink, Ton J.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Lee DH;Dane MJ;van den Berg BM;Boels MG;van Teeffelen JW;de Mutsert R;den Heijer M;Rosendaal FR;van der Vlag J;van Zonneveld AJ;Vink H;Rabelink TJ;NEO study group
通讯作者:
NEO study group
DOI:
10.1186/s13054-015-0741-z
发表时间:
2015-01-28
期刊:
Critical care (London, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Chelazzi C;Villa G;Mancinelli P;De Gaudio AR;Adembri C
通讯作者:
Adembri C
影响因子:
82.9
作者:
Schmidt, Eric P.;Yang, Yimu;Janssen, William J.;Gandjeva, Aneta;Perez, Mario J.;Barthel, Lea;Zemans, Rachel L.;Bowman, Joel C.;Koyanagi, Dan E.;Yunt, Zulma X.;Smith, Lynelle P.;Cheng, Sara S.;Overdier, Katherine H.;Thompson, Kathy R.;Geraci, Mark W.;Douglas, Ivor S.;Pearse, David B.;Tuder, Rubin M.
通讯作者:
Tuder, Rubin M.