The Science of Science Policy: New Findings Workshop

美国国家科学基金会的科学与创新政策（sciip）项目旨在资助基础知识的发展，包括理论、数据、工具和人力资本。sciip计划还寻求建立一个跨学术机构和学科的专家社区，专注于sciip。讲习班和后续活动旨在促进这两个目标。研讨会的目的是：-为科学知识产学研项目提供一个机会，在科学知识产学研项目的前两轮获奖项目开始出现在专业论坛和出版物上之前，就该项目正在进行的工作进行一次学术讨论。-为来自sciip奖项所反映的不同学科观点的研究人员提供一个共同论坛，以交流有关正在进行的工作的信息，同时使每种方法都接受学院审查；-向受助者提出问题/提供机会，以考虑如何延长、修订和增加他们目前的赠款，以便更直接地考虑国家科学和创新政策问题；-确定sciip重点领域的差距。与会者包括大约40名sciip奖获得者、NSF工作人员以及来自政府、学术和非政府组织的代表。研究人员和从业人员之间建立桥梁活动的理由是基于大量研究文献，这些文献记录了这种讲习班在促进跨分析观点的实质性对话方面的重要性。“更广泛的影响2”后续活动将突出sciip的活动和研讨会的成果。其中第一份报告是基于研讨会讨论的精馏，由共同项目负责人的论文加以补充，并广泛分发。第二个是由美国科学促进会科技政策论坛组织的一个特别小组“科学与创新政策科学的现状和新兴状态”，专门讨论研讨会的发现。

The National Science Foundation's Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) program has been directed at underwriting the development of fundamental knowledge, including theories, data, tools and human capital. The SciSIP program also seeks to develop a community of experts across academic institutions and disciplines focused on SciSIP. The workshop and follow on activities are designed to contribute to both objectives.Intellectual MeritThe workshop is designed to:- Provide the SciSIP program with an opportunity to have a collegial discussion of the work in progress under SciSIP's first two rounds of awards well before this work begins to appear in professional forums and publications.- Provide a common forum for researchers from the diverse set of disciplinary perspectives reflected in SciSIP's awards to exchange information about work in progress, while subjecting each approach to collegial review;- Pose questions/openings to grantees to consider how their current grants might be extended, revised, augmented to more directly consider national science and innovation policy issues;- Identify gaps in SciSIP's areas of emphasis.The attendees include approximately 40 recipients of SciSIP awards, NSF personnel, and representatives from a cross-section of governmental, academic, and non-governmental organizations.The rationale for a bridge building activity among researchers and practitioners is grounded in a corpus of research literature which documents the importance of such workshops in fostering substantive dialogue across analytical perspectives.Broader ImpactTwo follow on activities will highlight SciSIP's activities and the workshop's findings. The first of these is a report based on a distillation of the workshop's discussions augmented by essays by the co-PIs and distributed widely. The second is a special panel "The Current and Emerging Status of the Science of Science and Innovation Policy", devoted to the workshop's findings, and organized at the American Association for the Advancement of Sciences' AAAS Forum on Science & TechnologyPolicy.