Collaborative Reserach: Standard: Comparison of Communications across Campus Cultures (The 4C Project): Toward Evidence-based Customization of Learning Experiences
Collaborative Reserach: Standard: Comparison of Communications across Campus Cultures (The 4C Project): Toward Evidence-based Customization of Learning Experiences
批准号:
1540392
负责人:
Kathryn Haas
金额:
$6.32万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
Standard Grant
财政年份:
2015
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2015-09-15 至 2021-08-31
中文摘要
STEM专业人员的道德行为对于科学的进步、国民健康的进步、繁荣和福利都是必不可少的。因此,STEM受训人员必须接受适当的教育,以成长为对STEM内部的道德挑战表现出认识和理解的负责任的专业人员。“一刀切”的STEM伦理培训是否造就了一支训练有素的STEM员工队伍?该合作项目的目标是通过数据定义STEM伦理学习社区,然后制定一项战略,使社区与对他们有效的资源相匹配。通过这项研究,来自四所不同高等院校的数百名STEM学员将各自提供个人人口统计和学术信息、调查数据和撰写样本。将对生成的数据集进行分析,以确定哪些共同特征定义了伦理STEM学习社区。然后,基于证据的学习社区识别将提供基础,以便从战略上将它们与已经为伦理STEM教育开发的许多资源和经验的子集相匹配。这项研究将在不同选区和不同文化的校园同时进行:(1)圣玛丽学院,一所女子学院;(2)圣母大学,一所天主教研究型大学;(3)泽维尔大学,一所历史上的黑人学院或大学(HBCU);(4)弗吉尼亚大学,一所公立研究型大学。所采用的方法将包括管理和分析五个有效的量表(关于学习风格、个性、道德关怀、道德行为和环境取向),并以三种不同的格式(电子期刊条目、在线论坛和Twitter)对学生作文进行自动文本分析。为了开发和测试从这项研究中产生的差异化教学原则,来自每个机构的调查人员将设计和提供试点学习经验,将单一的既定道德教育资源或方法与一个明确的学习社区相结合。由此产生的案例报告和基本原则预计将在《STEM伦理学习社区的战略参与手册》中阐明,并在STEM研究网络、科学和工程伦理界、非正式科学和教育网络以及K-12科学教育网络中分发。
英文摘要
Ethical behavior of STEM professionals is essential for the progress of science, advancement of the national health, and prosperity and welfare. Therefore STEM trainees must receive the appropriate education to mature into responsible professionals that display an awareness and understanding of ethical challenges within STEM. Does "one size fits all" STEM ethics training result in a well-trained STEM workforce?The goal of this collaborative project is to define, through data, STEM ethics learning communities and then develop a strategy for matching communities with resources effective for them. Through this study, hundreds of STEM trainees from four distinct higher learning institutions will each provide individual demographic and academic information, survey data, and writing samples. The data sets generated will be analyzed to determine which common qualities define ethical STEM learning communities. Evidence-based identification of learning communities will then provide the basis for strategically matching them with a subset of the many resources and experiences already developed for ethical STEM education. This study will be conducted simultaneously at campuses with different constituencies and cultures: (1) Saint Mary's College, an all-women's college; (2) the University of Notre Dame, a Catholic research university; (3) Xavier University, a Historically Black College or University (HBCU); and (4) the University of Virginia, a public research university. The methods employed will include administration and analysis of five validated scales (for learning style, personality, moral concern, moral action, and environmental orientation) and automated text analysis of student writings in three different formats (electronic journal entry, online discussion forum, and Twitter). To develop and test principles of differentiated instruction emerging from this research, investigators from each institution will design and offer pilot learning experiences combining a single established resource or approach for ethics education with one defined learning community. The resulting case reports and underlying principles are expected to be articulated in the Strategic Engagement of Learning Communities for Ethical STEM Handbook and distributed across STEM research networks, the science and engineering ethics community, informal science and education networks, and K-12 science education networks.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
海外基金