RAPID: Research+Practice Collaboratory: Tools and Methods for Forming Research-Practice Partnerships

华盛顿大学作为研究+实践合作实验室的牵头组织，将举办三次研讨会，为建立新的CSforAll Solication(NSF 17-525)所要求的研究-实践伙伴关系(RPP)提供技术支持。这些实践工作坊是以2016年9月举行的一个较短的版本为蓝本的，设计目标是1。激发人们对RPP在支持可持续的、以公平为导向的CS教育的新努力方面的价值的兴趣；2.促进对形成和维持稳健的RPP的理解；3.支持团队开发适当的RPP研究问题和项目设计，从而可能对实践和理论产生好处。研讨会将于2017年1月在三个城市举行：亚特兰大、洛杉矶和芝加哥。未来的PI将适用于3-4人的团队。团队应包括一名负责课程和教学、专业发展/认证或评估的K-12教育工作者，一名负责在建筑物或教室层面实施改革的K-12教育工作者，以及一名在州或地区一级有效倡导公平的社区利益相关者。如果团队已经确定了一名教育研究员，该研究员也应该参加。其他教育研究人员将被邀请与团队合作。将生成一份简短的报告，总结感兴趣的领域、可能的紧张局势和新发现的机会，以便在研究人员和从业人员之间建立更强有力的联系，以推动以股权为导向的CSforAll努力。

The University of Washington, as the lead organization of the Research + Practice Collaboratory, will run three workshops to provide technical support for constructing the kinds of research-practice partnerships (RPPs) that are required by the new CSforAll Solicitation (NSF 17-525). The hands-on workshops, modeled on a shorter version held in September of 2016, are designed to1. Generate interest in the value of RPPs in supporting new efforts in sustainable, equity-oriented CS education, 2. Advance understanding on the formation and maintenance of robust RPPs, and 3. Support teams in the development of appropriate RPP research questions and project designs that could result in benefits to both practice and theory. The workshops will be held in January 2017 in three cities: Atlanta, Los Angeles, and Chicago. Prospective PIs will apply in teams of 3-4 people. Teams should include a K-12 educator with responsibility for curriculum and instruction, professional development/certification, or assessment, a K-12 educator who will be responsible for implementing changes at the building or classroom level, and, if relevant, a community stakeholder that is an effective advocate for equity at the state or district level. If the team has already identified an education researcher, that researcher should attend as well. Additional education researchers will be invited to work with the teams. A brief report will be generated summarizing the areas of interest, possible tensions, and newly identified opportunities with respect to creating stronger connections between researchers and practitioners that can advance the equity-oriented CSforAll effort.