Antique Surgery Between Orient and Occident: The Surgical Handbooks (cheirourgoúmena) by Leonides, Archigenes, Heliodoros and Antyllos - a Medico-Philological Inventory Based upon the Preserved Fragments.

古希腊外科手术在科学繁荣的亚历山大港达到顶峰。这一时期的原始论文已经丢失。然而，它们所包含的知识被所谓的“气动”外科医生列昂尼德斯、阿奇尼德斯(公元1世纪)、赫利奥多罗斯和安蒂洛(公元2世纪/3世纪)保存在汇编中。编年史上最后一部汇编，也可能是上述汇编中最成熟的一部，是亚历山大港的安蒂洛斯写的。根据后来的作者的说法，他被认为是古代最好的外科医生之一。他是唯一一位被证明其思想已经传播到阿拉伯世界的希腊外科医生--这一事实从他的作品中被引用，这一事实被引用到了阿尔-罗兹和阿卢伊本·S？的作品中。甚至更远的阿拉伯医学作家可能也会利用他。然而，直到今天，这一假设仍然无法得到证实，因为到目前为止，甚至还没有关于他的阿拉伯碎片的基本清单。对于他所有的希腊碎片和其他气动外科医生的碎片也是如此，所有这些仍然需要清点和分析。气动外科医生是古代唯一一位其碎片尚未按照现代文献学标准进行编辑的重要内科医生。请求继续该项目是出于以下目的：阿拉伯Antyllos文本将通过使用伊斯坦布尔的重要手稿进一步完成，而研究人员迄今尚未考虑这些手稿。最后，Antyllus研究报告的手稿必须根据出版商的指导方针进行修改。此外，莱昂尼德斯、阿基吉涅斯和赫利奥多鲁斯的片断收集工作将完成、评论并准备出版。由于引文经常交织在一起，由于段落的作者有时不清楚，有必要进行计算机化的风格分析来补充这项研究。此外，Celsus的选择性软组织手术(De Medicina，第7册)将被包括在总体视图中，因为它显示了与迄今收集的碎片的显著相似和依赖关系。随着Celsus手术的纳入，一项关于自古以来选择性软组织手术的所有传播的研究将是可用的。

Antique Greek surgery reached its peak in the scientifically prosperous climate of Hellenistic Alexandria. The original treatises dating from this period are lost. However, the knowledge contained in them has been preserved in the compendia by the so-called "pneumatic" surgeons Leonides, Archigenes (1st century A. D.), Heliodoros and Antyllos (2nd / 3rd century A. D.). The compendium last in chronology and possibly the most mature of the aforementioned ones is by Antyllos of Alexandria. According to later authors, he was regarded as one of the best surgeons of antiquity. He is the only Hellenistic surgeon whose ideas are proven to have spread to the Arabic world - a fact that is shown by quotes of his work occurring in the works by ar-Râzî and 'Alî ibn 'Îsâ. Even further Arabic medical authors might have drawn upon him. However, to this day this hypothesis cannot be proven, since not even a basic inventory of his Arabic fragments exists so far. This is equally true for all his Greek fragments and as well for the fragments of other pneumatic surgeons, all of which still have to be inventorised and analysed. The pneumatic surgeons are the only important physicians of antiquity whose fragments have not yet been edited according to the standards of modern philology.The request for continuation of the project is motivated by the following aims: the Arabic Antyllos text ist to be further completed by using important manuscripts from Istanbul that have not been taken into account by researchers so far. Finally the manuscript of the Antyllus study has to be reworked according to the guidelines of the publisher. Furthermore, the collections of fragments of Leonides, Archigenes and Heliodorus are to be completed, commented on and to be made ready for publication. Because of the often intertwined quotations and due to passages of sometimes unclear authorship, a computerized stylometric analysis is necessary to suplement the study. In addition, the elective soft tissue surgery of Celsus' (De medicina, book 7) is to be included in the overall view, since it shows remarkable parallels and dependencies with the fragments collected so far. With the inclusion of Celsus surgery, a study of all that has been transmitted of elective soft tissue surgery from antiquity will be available.