Alexander of Aphrodisias' commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics revisited: a new edition of the Greek text on the basis of a complete collation of unknown sources.

该项目旨在制作一个新的批评版本的亚历山大的阿佛洛狄西亚（fl.公元200年）对亚里士多德的形而上学的评论，这是几个世纪以来最能塑造哲学家理解的文本之一。到目前为止，这个文本已经被编辑了两次（1847年由赫尔曼·博尼茨；1891年由迈克尔·海达克），但在一个非常不令人满意的方式，主要有三个原因：1)两个版本依赖于一个不充分的启发式工作的手稿传统的评论。2)两位编辑的文本主要基于对两份手稿的整理，而事先没有对它们进行任何系统的调查。3)两位编辑错误地将6 /7世纪对亚里士多德《形而上学》的匿名评论手稿与亚历山大的真实评论手稿结合在一起，从而导致了许多错误的“更正”。本项目的目的是生产一个可靠的版本的亚历山大的评论形而上学，基于一个完整的整理文本独立的希腊手稿，以及拉丁文翻译胡安·吉尼特Sepúlveda(1527)，并符合现代标准的语言学和文本科学。

The project aims at producing a new critical edition of Alexander of Aphrodisias' (fl. AD 200) commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics, one of the texts that most shaped the understanding of the Philosopher for centuries. This text has been edited twice up to date (1847 by Hermann Bonitz; 1891 by Michael Hayduck) but in a very unsatisfactory manner, mainly for three reasons: 1) Both editions rely on an inadequate heuristic work on the manuscript tradition of the commentary. 2) Both editors based their text mainly on a collation of just two manuscripts without having previously undertaken any stemmatic investigation of them. 3) Both editors misleadingly combined manuscripts that contain an anonymous commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics from the 6th/7th cent. with manuscripts that transmit Alexander's genuine commentary, thus leading to numerous false 'corrections'. The aim of the present project is to produce a reliable edition of Alexander's commentary on the Metaphysics, based on a complete collation of the textually independent Greek manuscripts as well as of the Latin translation by Juan Ginès Sepúlveda (1527), and conform to modern standards of philology and text science.