The making of plausibility in interpretive texts. Analyses of argumentative practices in literary studies

将分析100篇研究论文的语料库，以调查文学文本解释中使用的策略，使他们的假设可信。这个以行为学为导向的项目恢复了20世纪70年代的研究，将它们与当前的论证概念作为一种社会实践联系起来，并发展了一种特殊的解释学的、基于标准的方法，以系统地考虑呈现方式来分析文本的论证结构。它旨在获得关于文学研究中知识产生和调解的一个特别重要的实践的更详细的知识，尽管它很重要，但几乎没有被探索过。同时，该项目旨在揭示特定于该学科或其某些领域的隐含规则。此外，这将有助于促进文学研究中辩论实践的交流。

A corpus of 100 research papers will be analyzed to investigate the strategies used in interpretations of literary texts to make their hypotheses plausible. The praxeologically oriented project resumes studies of the 1970s, links them with current concepts of argumentation as a social practice and develops a special hermeneutical, criterion-based method to analyze the argumentation structure of the texts with systematic consideration of the means of presentation. It aims at gaining more detailed knowledge about a particularly important practice of the generation and mediation of knowledge in literary studies, that, despite of its importance, has hardly been explored. At the same time the project aims at disclosing implicit rules that are specific to the discipline or to some of its areas. Furthermore, it will contribute to improve the communication about the argumentative practice in literary studies.