Popular narratives of a good life. Interrelationships between medicine and temporality on German television

该分项目从现代德国文学和面向电视研究的媒体研究的角度，分析了(大众)媒体在医学背景下对美好生活的时间概念的再现和谈判。考虑到当前的医学发展和个人重新定位与德国线性电视和非线性流媒体服务感知和电视化的成功生活有关，时间观念的变化是如何？上述大众媒体将自己作为分析时间取向模式的感兴趣的对象，因为美好生活的条件和(伦理)理由的问题是其所有形式的中心、明确和隐含的组成部分。然而，最重要的是，它们被归因于以道德话语的术语传达“媒体医学”(“媒体医学”)的功能(Wulff 2001,247,258)。此外，它们记录和记录了一个人一生中新出现的疾病、衰老经历或医学发展所质疑的处理方式的变化；它们有助于话语间的知识普及和生活和社会概念的正常化，从而使媒体过程的影响可以同时观察到“流行”和“正常”；有时，由于它们的沉浸式潜力，它们具有缓解治疗功能，但也可能迷失方向。正是在这种媒体医学的案例研究叙述(叙事化)中，医学和社会变化之间的相互关系不仅变得特别清楚；相反，由于对广大人口群体的大规模处理，这种相互关系在那里也得到了谈判和文化上的有效。因此，研究单位的主要论文中所述的医学和寿命之间的关系将根据公众在德国电视上的看法进行讨论和区分，如有必要，甚至予以纠正。与时间主权的指导概念相一致，该分项目分析了与研究单位有关的所有三个应用场景，询问它们如何作为一种流行医学(伦理)的形式表现出来。因此，它与SP4(社会学/社会心理学)和SP5(生殖医学伦理学)以及SP6(全科医学)和SP7(老年医学伦理学)密切交流。通过将重点放在(疾病)叙述上，该分项目与SP3(心理心脏病学)直接相关。在根本的、有理论依据的尊重方面--即关于临时性和美好生活的问题--它有赖于与战略计划1(哲学)的持续合作。

The subproject analyses the (mass) media representation and negotiation of temporal conceptions of the good life in the context of medicine from the perspective of a modern German literature and media studies oriented towards television studies. How are changing conceptions of time considering current medical developments and individual reorientations in relation to a successful life perceived and televisualized by German linear television and non-linear streaming services? The aforementioned mass media offer themselves as objects of interest for the analysis of temporal orientation patterns, because the question of the conditions and (ethical) justifications of a good life is a central, explicit and implicit component of all their formats. Above all, however, they are ascribed the function of conveying a “Medienmedizin” ("media medicine") (Wulff 2001, 247, 258) in moral-discursive terms. In addition, they document and archive the changed handling of one's own lifetime, which is newly questioned by diseases, experiences of aging or by medical developments; they contribute both to the interdiscursive popularization of knowledge and to the normalization of conceptions of life and society, whereby they make 'popularity' and 'normality' simultaneously observable as effects of media processes; and sometimes, due to their immersive potential, they have relieving therapeutic functions, but can also be disorientating. It is precisely in the case study narratives of such media medicine (narrativization) that the interrelation between medical and social change not only becomes particularly clear; rather, it is also negotiated and culturally effective there because of the mass addressing of broad sections of the population. The relationship between medicine and life time addressed in the leading thesis of the research unit will thus be discussed and differentiated, if necessary even corrected, with regard to its public perception on German television. Aligned with the guiding concept of time sovereignty, the subproject analyses all three application scenarios relevant to the research unit by asking how they are represented as a form of popular medicine (ethics). It is therefore in close exchange with SP 4 (sociology/social psychology) and SP 5 (ethics of reproductive medicine) as well as with SP 6 (general practice) and SP 7 (ethics of geriatric medicine). By focusing on (disease) narratives, the subproject is directly linked to SP 3 (psychocardiology). In a fundamental, theoretically founded respect – i.e. with regard to questions of temporality and the good life – it is dependent on a continuous cooperation with SP 1 (philosophy).