Conflict Strategies in Innovation Markets (1850-1990)

以创新为基础的市场在经济研究中发挥着重要作用，现在经济研究还涉及工业产权的战略工具化和相关的竞争地位。最新的是，苹果和三星之间长期存在的法律纠纷向广大公众表明，专利或设计权等法律地位也可能导致实质性冲突，其经济后果几乎不容忽视，不仅对涉及的公司，而且对整个经济。因此，目前的网络倡议旨在将市场参与者之间的冲突及其解决机制置于历史跨学科讨论的中心。调查对象将是关于工业产权(包括专利、商标、外观设计权利)以及相关保护概念(如卡特尔和竞争制度)的纠纷，在1850年至1990年的研究期间，这些纠纷使我们期望得到关于冲突的触发、解决和管理的有效结果。在此申请的网络的目的是实现本专题领域的跨学科交流，以便在不同学科之间产生明显的差异和期望，但也能在各学科之间产生重叠和协同作用。因此，该网络应首先作为经济和公司历史以及法律历史的研究对象，促进强化冲突战略，从而促进跨学科交流。这样的侧写也有助于对这个话题进行必要的客观化，这个话题已经并将在当前的公共话语中受到强烈的指责。其次，该网络将在上述历史分学科的界面上开发一种方法，以便将冲突战略确立为一个共同的研究领域，在该领域中，共同点和重叠是可见和可用的，但也明确了方法上的差异，以开发该研究领域在学术和公共辩论方面的潜力。处于网络前沿的问题是，公司如何在竞争条件下管理冲突，他们使用什么工具来这样做，以及他们如何将由此产生的后果整合到他们的商业活动中。通过这种方式，该网络的目的不仅是确定创新市场中冲突的主题或其分类，而且还有助于破译处理这些冲突的战略。

Innovation-based markets play an important role in economic research, which is now also concerned with the strategic instrumentalization of industrial property rights and related competitive positions. At the latest, the long-standing legal dispute between Apple and Samsung has made it clear to a broad public that legal positions such as patents or design rights can also result in substantial conflicts, the economic consequences of which can hardly be ignored, not only for the companies that are involved, but also for the economy as a whole. The present network initiative therefore aims to place conflicts between market actors and the mechanisms for their resolution at the center of a historical-interdisciplinary discourse. The object of investigation will be disputes over industrial property rights (including patents, trademarks, design rights) as well as related concepts of protection (such as the cartel and competition regime), which, during the period under study between 1850 and 1990, lead us to expect valid findings on the triggering, settlement and management of conflicts. The aim of the network applied for here is to enable an interdisciplinary exchange for the present topic area in order to make visible differences and desiderata, but also overlaps and synergies in the respective disciplines. The network should thereby firstly contribute to sharpening conflict strategies as an object of economic and corporate history and legal history and thereby facilitate an interdisciplinary exchange. Such a profiling also serves a necessary objectification of the topic, which has been and will be strongly charged in the current public discourse. Secondly, the network is to develop a methodological offer at the interfaces of the historical subdisciplines mentioned above in order to establish conflict strategies as a common field of research in which commonalities and overlaps are made visible and usable, but also methodological differences are specified in order to exploit the potential of the research field for academic, but also public debate. At the forefront of the network is the question of how companies managed conflicts under competitive conditions, what instruments they used to do so, and how they integrated the resulting consequences into their business activities. In this way, the network aims not only to define the subject matter of conflicts or their categorization in innovation markets, but also to help decipher strategies for dealing with them.