The Experimental Study of Paleolithic Edge-ground Stone Axes in Japan

它可以抛光很多磨边的石斧。都是旧石器时代早期在日本出土的。仅使用石器的边磨技术只有澳大利亚、日本在旧石器时代晚期。都是为什么在很多大陆旧石器时代的遗址中没有发掘出局部的边地斧，为什么在旧石器时代早期的日本列岛上看到了很多斧头，还有很多问题需要解决。它在本研究中考虑了这一点，同时使用了关于这种局部边磨斧的使用的实验研究。到目前为止，指定使用对象的研究已经发展到用高倍金相显微镜对石器进行观察的使用研究。然而，由于使用软石，使用消失抛光切割部分多次，并使用研究硬石，如黑曜石，海图，硬页岩是一个中心，等进展较晚的斧头。观察使用……的例子，近年来终于有了更多有关时期的报道。研究人员的学术研究环境也存在问题，本研究采用低倍率的体视显微镜观察实验斧的边缘。也有根本不承认使用的例子，尽管观察挖掘斧头的例子仍然很少，但这成为了一个问题。结果，在工作中切割部分的线状疤痕和微小片状疤痕和原木加工（执行非毁林而是木材的加工实验）中承认了一些差异，这些加工去除了假设拆除动物的关节。有必要承认，在一个微小的片状疤痕中，目标材料的一部分与针对木材的实验中的材料不同，并扩大对物体进行小实验的例子，现在提出具体的结论，尽管这似乎是由物体（关节和木材）的硬度差异得出的结论。少

It polishes and a lot of edge-ground stone axes .are excavated in Japan at the early Upper Paleolithic age. The edge-ground technology is used only stone implement is only Australia, Japan at Upper Paleolithic age. Are why not a local edge-ground axes excavated in a lot of continental paleolith ruins, why a lot of axe seen in the Japanese Islands at the period of the early Upper Paleolithic age, and there are a lot of problems for solution.It considered it in the present study while using an experimental study about the usage of this local edge-ground axe. Up to now, the research of specifying the use object has progressed to use research on the stone implement by the observation with the metallurgical microscope of a high magnification. However, because soft stone was used, use disappeared polishing the cutting portion many times, and use research on hard stone such as obsidian, charts, and hard shales was a center, etc. progress was late for the axe. The example of observing use of t … More he axe of a period concerned at last has come to be reported in recent years. There was a problem of research representative's academic research environment, too and the edge of the experiment axe by the stereomicroscope of the low magnification was observed in the present study. There was an example of not admitting use at all, too and it became a problem though the example of observing the excavation axe was still few.As a result, some differences were admitted in a linear scar and a minute flake scar in the cutting portion in work and the log processing (The processing experiment of not deforestation but wood was executed) that removed the joint that assumed the dismantlement of the animal. It is necessary to be admitted differing in a minute flake scar by the part of targeted kind of material and material in the experiment intended for wood, and to expand the example of a little experimenting on the object to put out the concrete conclusion now though this seems the one by the hardness difference of the object (joint and wood). Less