Role of the Russian Orthodoxy in Cultural Integration of the Russian Empire during the 19th century.

世纪上半叶的俄罗斯东正教神学没有足够的使命感来构建俄罗斯东正教的原始护教学，这促进了俄罗斯帝国的文化整合。此外，总的来说，许多有创造力的神学家已经远离了帝国的世俗权力。在19世纪70年代及以后，俄罗斯东正教会的原始护教学的建设开始进行。此外，一个系统化的护教学，可能匹配的独特性，俄罗斯东正教和当代情况来定向开始约从1905年。在此背景下，改革派神学家对俄罗斯东正教会中过于保守的原则和右翼的民族中心主义产生了越来越大的危机感，世俗青年学生对神学的兴趣也越来越大。然而，与西欧的护教文献相比，俄罗斯东正教的护教文献作为与非信徒进行具体对话的一种途径，其质量和数量都非常有限。俄罗斯东正教神学家的思想倾向并非铁板一块，他们之间存在着几次严重的冲突。因此，总的来说，俄罗斯东正教神学家积极参与促进俄罗斯帝国文化一体化进程的努力是非常薄弱的，俄罗斯帝国由多教派和多民族居民组成。

Russian Orthodox theology in the first half of the 19th century did not have adequate sense of a mission to build the original apologetics of Russian Orthodoxy, which promoted the cultural integration of the Russian Empire. Moreover, in general, many creative theologians had distanced themselves from the secular power of the Empire. In the 1870s and later, construction of the original apologetics for the Russian Orthodox Church began to be undertaken. Moreover, a systematization of apologetics that might match the uniqueness of Russian Orthodoxy and the contemporary situation came to be oriented beginning approximately from1905. In the background, there arose a growing sense of crisis amongst reformative theologians about excessively conservative principles and the ethnocentrism of the right wing in the Russian Orthodox Church, as well as an increased interest in theology among secular youth students. However, compared with the apologetics literature of western Europe-the quality and quantity of apologetics literature of Russian Orthodoxy, as a circuit of specific dialogue with non-believers-was very limited. The trend of thought of Russian Orthodox theologianswas not necessarily monolithic, and there were several serious conflicts among them. Thus, in general, the efforts of theologians of Russian Orthodoxy to actively engage in promoting the process of cultural integration of the Russian Empire, which consistedof multiconfessional and multiethnic habitants, were very weak.