Fundamental study of a party-concerned drawing-in system

当这种卖方的抗辩义务被否定后，日耳曼民族法中存在的“抗辩义务”是以卖方对买方的抗辩义务为基础的，此后，“抗辩义务”逐渐消失。根据法国的法律，卖方的辩护义务的想法是维持的，并在该国接受了强制参与制度。也就是说，它核查了否认“成瘾”不是法律程序法典的问题，而是实体法的问题。美国法律对诉讼之外的第三人胜诉的制度，是为了能够检查即使是与纠纷有关的第三人，即判决既判力所延伸到的范围是诉讼的对象，并与之密切相关，理解一种干预参与制度——诉讼——的基础变得清晰起来[一种政治观点]。

When this seller's defense duty came to be denied that "Adicitation" which existed in the Germanic peoples method is based on the defense duty to a seller's buyer, and after that, "Adicitation" came to disappear gradually. By the laws of France, the idea of this seller's defense duty is maintained, and a compulsive participating system is accepted there in the country. That is, it has checked that denial of "Adicitation" had been not the problem of a code of legal procedure but a problem of the substantive law.The system which wins over the third party besides a lawsuit by the laws of U.S. to a lawsuit, in order to be able to check that even the third party in connection with dispute from which the range which the effect Res judicata of judgment extends to was the target of the lawsuit is contained, and being related closely and to understand an intervenient participation system -- a lawsuit -- the foundation became clear [ a political viewpoint ].