Learning from Domestic Homicide Reviews using Experience Based Co-Design

拟议的研究旨在弥补现有关于家庭凶杀知识的重要空白，并旨在从因家庭凶杀而失去亲属的家庭、家庭虐待的受害者/幸存者的经验中学习；专业人员和家庭凶杀案审查（DHRs）记录、分析、绘制地图并影响政策和做法，以防止未来发生家庭凶杀案。本研究中使用的家庭凶杀定义将遵循内政部（2016）指南。为了全面了解从人权报告中学到的知识，该研究分为三个工作包：在工作包1中，我们将对以下方面进行系统的文献综述：(1)审查家庭杀人案的国际方法；ii)确定从国际人权报告中吸取的关键教训；iii)调查人权报告产生的任何举措，重点关注其影响。在工作包2中，我们将首先检索并使用定量方法分析2016年6月后英格兰和威尔士322个社区安全伙伴关系（csp）（约200个）中所有公开可用的dhr，以添加到我们现有的数据集和141个dhr的初步分析中（收集于2011年7月至2016年6月）。我们将细化在试点研究中创建的模板，以识别和提取dhr中的变量，并将其输入SPSS。将进行描述性分析，以产生频率和比例，并对关键变量进行交叉制表。统计检验还将用于确定主要趋势和风险因素。其次，我们将对以下案件的dhr样本进行深入的定性分析：i)成人家庭杀人案；（二）家庭虐待与药物滥用、精神健康或残疾并存的复杂案件；Iii)有18岁以下儿童的家庭；黑人和少数民族家庭；v)分析上述DHRs中提出的建议；vi)创建DHRs的开放存取库。一旦收集和分类了所有dhr，将计算出子集的样本量。这些子集是基于我们对DHR的初步分析（Chantler等人，即将出版）和现有DHR文献。该工作包将提供对人权报告的大规模分析以及对具体子集的重点分析，并可用于为可能导致杀人的家庭虐待案件的预防和风险管理提供信息。工作包3采用基于经验的协同设计（EBCD）方法，这是一种创新的、面向行动的方法，从另一个维度来考察国内凶杀案审查服务的效用、学习和未来发展。格温特和兰开夏郡（包括19个csp）将作为EBCD组成部分的研究地点。EBCD是一个分阶段的过程，包括收集经验和观点：1)因家庭谋杀而失去亲人的家庭成员；Ii)遭受过攻击或跟踪的家庭暴力幸存者。将进行20个一对一的深度视频访谈，并使用聆听指南方法（Gilligan & Brown 1991）进行分析，以确定“接触点”，以说明受害者，家庭，良好做法和失去的干预机会的旅程。在与参与者协商后，这些视频将被编辑下来，以创建一个数字故事，作为开发新工作方式的联合活动的基础。还将与曾与受害者合作或参与人权报告的专业人员进行20次访谈，并对这些访谈进行专题分析。在对第一阶段工作和第二阶段工作进行分析并从访谈中确定主题之后，将与两个CSP网络召开为期一天的活动，分享学习成果并确定行动重点。由社会工作、警务、卫生、csp、AAFDA、安全网、议程、幸存者、学术专家、内政部和dhr的作者和质量保证人员代表组成的咨询小组将提供专业知识，帮助招聘，并是传播和影响的关键。

The proposed study addresses important gaps in existing knowledge of domestic homicide and aims to learn from the experiences of families who have lost a relative to domestic homicide, victims/survivors of domestic abuse; professionals and domestic homicide reviews (DHRs) to document, analyse, map, and influence policy and practice to prevent future domestic homicides. The definition of domestic homicide used in this study will follow that of the Home Office (2016) guidance. To build comprehensive knowledge of the learning from DHRs, the study is organised in three work packages: In Work Package 1 we will conduct a systematic literature review of i) international approaches to the review of domestic homicides; ii) identify key learning from international DHRs and iii) investigate any resultant initiatives from the DHRs, focusing on their impact. In Work Package 2 we will firstly retrieve and use a quantitative approach to analyse all publicly available DHRs from 322 Community Safety Partnerships (CSPs) in England & Wales post June 2016 (approximately 200) to add to our existing dataset and preliminary analysis of 141 DHRs (collected from July 2011 - June 2016). We will refine the template created in our pilot study to identify and extract variables from DHRs to feed into SPSS. Descriptive analysis will be carried out to generate frequencies and proportions, with cross-tabulation of key variables. Statistical tests will also be used to identify key trends and risk factors. Secondly, we will conduct an in-depth qualitative analysis of a sample of DHRs of: i) adult family homicides; ii) complex cases where domestic abuse co-exists with substance misuse, mental health or disability; iii) families with children under 18; iv) black and minority ethnic families; v) analyse the recommendations made in DHRs in the above and vi) create an open access repository of DHRs. Sample sizes for the subsets will be worked out once all DHRs have been collected and categorised. These subsets are based on our preliminary analysis of DHRs (Chantler et al, forthcoming) and existing DHR literature. This work package will provide a large scale analysis of DHRs as well as a focussed analysis of specific sub-sets and can be utilised to inform prevention and risk management of domestic abuse cases that may lead to homicide.Work Package 3 employs an experience-based co-design (EBCD) approach, an innovative, action orientated methodology bringing an additional dimension to interrogate the utility, learning and future development of services from domestic homicide reviews. Gwent and Lancashire (covering 19 CSPs) will act as study sites for the EBCD component. EBCD is a staged process involving gathering experiences and views of i) family members who have lost a relative to domestic homicide; ii) survivors of domestic abuse who have experienced assaults or stalking. Twenty one-to-one in-depth video interviews will be conducted which will be analysed using the Listening Guide method (Gilligan & Brown 1991) to identify 'touch points' to illustrate the journeys of victims, families, good practice and lost opportunities for intervention. The videos will be edited down in consultation with participants to create a digital story as the basis for conjoint activities to develop new ways of working. Twenty interviews will also be conducted with professionals who have worked with victims or been involved in DHRs and these will be analysed thematically. Following the analysis of WP1 and 2, and the identification of themes from interviews, a full day event will be convened with the two CSP networks to share the learning and to identify priorities for action. An advisory group comprising representatives of Social Work, Policing, Health, CSPs, AAFDA, Safe-Net, AGENDA, survivors, academic experts, Home Office and authors and quality assurers of DHRs will provide expertise, help with recruitment and are key to dissemination and impact.