AErosol model RObustness and Sensitivity study for improved climate and air quality prediction (AEROS)

Aeros是利兹大学、牛津大学、英国气象局和EMEP合作的项目，旨在全面评估最新一代全球气溶胶模型的性能、量化不确定性并制定改进策略。气雾剂对气候有重要但非常不确定的影响(气专委，2007年)。不确定性主要来自模式间的差异、出于计算成本原因对气溶胶过程的必要简化以及用于模式评估的观测的不确定性。最近已经为几个气候模型开发了复杂的“下一代”气溶胶微物理方案，旨在增强模型的真实性和提高预测的可靠性。这些模型解决了颗粒大小和各种化学成分，并使用了完整的微物理方案，包括成核、凝聚、尺寸分辨沉积、云处理等。这种先进的气溶胶模型的开发带来了本提案旨在解决的新的实质性挑战。首先，复杂气溶胶模式的计算需求意味着不确定度分析技术没有被常规使用，因此我们很少有信息来指导模式改进(模式因素的不确定度重要性、结构与参数不确定度的相对重要性等)。我们将使用敏感性和不确定性分析技术来确定所需的最重要的模型改进。其次，由于气溶胶模型已经消耗了气候模型运行时间的很大一部分，客观地评估模型的复杂程度至关重要，以便优先考虑和优化未来的发展。以前的模型评估没有回答模型是否比要求的更复杂或开发工作应该投资于哪里的问题。这一建议的一个重要方面是量化模型的解释能力与复杂性，这可能是规模相关的。在模型中已经昂贵的部分找到适当程度的复杂性将带来巨大的好处：更多和更长的模型运行，更多的气候敏感性测试，等等。第三，更复杂的模型需要针对同样信息丰富的数据集进行评估。但大多数微物理量(如颗粒数量、大小分辨成分等)只能通过飞机和地面站上相当局部化的原位技术进行测量。稀疏的测量将模型评估的许多方面限制在案例研究上，而不是在以前的评估中使用的长期平均测量，如AeroCom。因此，目前这一代的气溶胶模型已经根据可用微物理观测的一小部分进行了评估。在这个项目中，我们的目标是通过利用2008年5月进行的欧盟反腐败联盟和欧洲、中东和太平洋地区密集运动的观察结果来克服这一问题。通过综合密集的观测，我们将致力于预测量之间的一致性，并避免在使用单一数据集时出现的补偿模型因素的问题。AeroCom国际气溶胶比对项目非常成功地记录了模拟气溶胶的最新技术。它汇集了大多数全球气溶胶模型的观测和结果，以评估我们对全球气溶胶效应的理解。然而，很难在广泛的模型中建立可比较的诊断方法，这使得很难将结果的差异归因于特定的过程。我们的方法将在过程级别评估模型，并首次根据微物理观测评估它们的性能。这项提议的总体成果将是改进对气溶胶性质、可变性和空间分布的预报，这是准确预报气溶胶气候和空气质量影响的基本要求。

AEROS is a collaboration of the University of Leeds, Oxford University, the UK Met Office and EMEP to comprehensively assess the performance, quantify the uncertainties and develop strategies for improvements of the latest generation of global aerosol models. Aerosols have an important but very uncertain impact on climate (IPCC, 2007). The uncertainty derives primarily from inter-model differences, the necessary simplification of aerosol processes for computational cost reasons, and uncertainties in the observations used for model evaluation. Complex 'next generation' aerosol microphysics schemes have recently been developed for several climate models that are intended to enhance model realism and improve the reliability of predictions. The models resolve particle sizes and various chemical components, and use a full microphysics scheme including nucleation, coagulation, size-resolved deposition, cloud processing, etc. The development of such advanced aerosol models creates new and substantial challenges that this proposal aims to address. Firstly, the computational demands of complex aerosol models mean that techniques of uncertainty analysis have not been routinely used, so we have very little information to guide model improvement (uncertainty importance of model factors, relative importance of structural versus parameter uncertainty, etc). We will use sensitivity and uncertainty analysis techniques to identify the most important model improvements required. Secondly, because aerosol models already consume a large fraction of climate model run-time, it is vital to assess the level of model complexity objectively so as to prioritise and optimise future development. Previous model assessments have not answered the question of whether models are more or less complex than required or where development effort should be invested. An important aspect of this proposal is the quantification of model explanatory power versus complexity, which may be scale-dependent. The benefits of finding an appropriate level of complexity in an already expensive part of the model will be enormous: more and longer model runs, more climate sensitivity tests, etc. Thirdly, more complex models require evaluation against equally information-rich datasets. But most microphysical quantitites (such as particle number, size-resolved composition, etc) can only be measured with fairly localised in situ techniques from aircraft and from ground stations. The sparse measurements restrict many aspects of model evaluation to case studies rather than long-term average measurements used in previous evaluations such as AeroCom. So the present generation of aerosol models have been evaluated against a tiny fraction of available microphysics observations. In this project we aim to overcome this problem by exploiting observations from the EUCAARI and EMEP intensive campaigns conducted in May 2008. By synthesising intensive observations we will aim for consistency among predicted quantities and avoid the problem of compensating model factors that arises when single datasets are used. The AeroCom international aerosol intercomparison project has been very successful in documenting the state-of-the-art of the simulated aerosol. It has assembled observations and results from the majority of global aerosol models to assess our understanding of global aerosol effects. However, the difficulty of establishing comparable diagnostics across a wide range of models has made it difficult to attribute differences in the results to specific processes. Our approach will assess the models at the processes level and evaluate their performance against microphysics observations for the first time. The overall outcome of this proposal will be improvement in predictions of aerosol properties, variability and spatial distribution that are fundamental requirements for accurate prediction of aerosol climate and air quality effects.