Using data to compare the health impact of mobility infrastructure in cities (just what the doctor ordered)

本研究旨在探索情景评估工具的适当模型和方法，该工具将利用数据评估发达国家与健康效益有关的移动基础设施设计。这将通过在不同国家的几个案例研究地点测试新出现的模型和方法来实现。有三个阶段：1。基准测试/“检查”现有场地面积/交通基础设施将根据BRE新兴的健康城市指数指标进行评估，并与整个城市和全球其他类似城市的当前表现进行比较2。机会和制约因素评估/诊断：确定替代交通基础设施和潜在制约因素的选择，并将其与当地优先事项和容易获胜的因素进行比较。3所示。设计测试/“预测”新的设计建议可以针对基本情况（即现有场地面积）进行测试，并使用相同的健康和其他效益指标/措施进行评估。我们提出以下方法和研究阶段（见excel表格）：1。流动基础设施与健康的总体概况/趋势2。参照其他社会、经济和环境方面的共同效益，确定健康效益与流动基础设施之间的主要关系。3. 选择与移动基础设施相关的现有最佳实践研究以及在前一阶段确定的好处。4. 确定措施和指标，以实现情景的基准目标，并确定机会/限制。5. 分析/回顾现有的工具/方法——这包括识别现有的工具/方法、差距/机会和市场。6. 分析/审查数据——包括现有数据、数据差距、数据要求和质量。7. 开发方法，以便在基准测试（检查）、确定机会/限制（诊断）和测试场景（手术）三个阶段开发场景工具。8. 在一个或两个项目测试案例研究中，使用现有的和可用的软件和工具来测试方法论——“概念验证”。研究/技术报告传播研究：开发营销材料并在内部和外部传播

This research looks to exploring the appropriate model and methodology for a scenario appraisal tool which will utilize data to assess mobility infrastructure designs in relation to health benefits in developed countries. This will be achieved by testing the emerging model and methodology on several case study sites in different countries. There are three stages:1. Benchmarking / 'check up'Existing site area / mobility infrastructure will be assessed according to BRE's emerging Healthy Cities Index indicators and compared to current performance across the city and in other similar cities worldwide2. Opportunities and constraints assessment / 'diagnostics'Options for alternative mobility infrastructure and potential constraints are identified and compared with local priorities and easy-wins. -3. Design testing / 'prognosis'New design proposals can be tested against the base case (i.e. existing site area) and assessed using the same defined indicators / measures for health and other benefits. We propose the following methodology and research stages (see excel spreadsheet):1. General overview / trends on mobility infrastructure and health2. Definition of key relationships between health benefits and mobility infrastructure with reference to co-benefits across other social, economic and environmental considerations. 3. Selection of existing best practice studies with regards to mobility infrastructure and the benefits identified in the previous phase. 4. Identify measures and indicators for enabling the scenario's benchmarking purposes and identification of opportunities / constraints. 5. Analysis / review of existing tools / methodology - this includes identifying existing tools / methodologies, gaps / opportunities and the market. 6. Analysis / review of data - this includes existing data, data gaps and data requirements and quality. 7. Development of the methodology to enable the scenario tool development at the three stages of benchmarking (check-up), identifying opportunities / constraints (diagnosis) and testing scenarios (surgery). 8. Testing the methodology using existing and available software and tools on one or two project test case studies - 'proof of concept'.9. Research / Technical reporting10. Communicating research: development of marketing material and dissemination internally and externally