课题基金 / 基金详情

Quantifying the Uncertainty In Future Flood Hazard Assessment Assuming Climate Change Uncertainties

Quantifying the Uncertainty In Future Flood Hazard Assessment Assuming Climate Change Uncertainties
假设气候变化存在不确定性,量化未来洪水灾害评估的不确定性
批准号:
1989537
负责人:
金额:
$0.0万
依托单位:
依托单位国家:
英国
项目类别:
Studentship
财政年份:
2017
资助国家:
英国
项目状态:
已结题
起止时间:
2017 至 --

项目摘要

项目成果

相似基金

相关文献

中文摘要
翻译
洪水在世界范围内产生巨大影响。在英国,2015/16年的洪水造成了超过13亿英镑的损失。目前关于气候变化及其对未来洪水危害影响的研究的共识是,在英国,洪水将变得更加频繁和更加极端。有能力适当防范这些自然灾害,将减少发生的经济和社会影响,并保护子孙后代。在模拟洪水灾害的过程中,区域气候模型(RCM)作为水文模型的输入。然后使用极值定理对这些进行分析,将输入输入到水力模型中。最后,水力模型输出生成给定区域的洪水概率图。在每个阶段,输入(RCM)、结构(水力模型)和参数(摩擦系数)都存在不确定性。这导致了整个系统的不确定性级联。不确定性量化的目的是识别不确定性的来源,并了解它如何通过模型框架级联。当决策正在进行时,重要的是要充分了解与系统相关的总的不确定性。概率图用于创建具有给定洪水概率的区域。与确定性方法相比,这导致更好地理解未来可能的情景。洪水具有内在的不确定性,因此洪水风险管理必须考虑到不确定性。调查和量化概率映射中的不确定性已成为洪水淹没建模的一个感兴趣的领域。然而,工业和学术研究人员一直在验证和验证水力模型,但运行的模拟数量有限。这并没有考虑到水力模型中的结构或输入不确定性。因此,需要蒙特卡罗类型的方法。增加水力模型的维数可降低结构不确定性,并创建更真实的输出,但需要更多的运行时间。因此,比较1D/2D混合模型和全2D水力模型的输出和结构不确定性将有助于决定哪一种最适合不同的研究。可以实施不同的采样技术和计算成本降低方法来加快运行时间:拉丁超立方体采样,多级蒙特卡罗,马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗和多级马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗都将进行研究和比较。这些方法降低了计算成本,由于在收敛速度的增加,同时增加精度相比,简单的蒙特卡罗方法。将探索利用替代模型,因为它们可以运行得更快,同时通过外推模型输出保持所需的准确性。代理模型也可以用于不确定性传播通过系统和灵敏度analysis.The应用这些改进的水力建模过程和方差减少技术将导致在英国的案例研究更准确的概率图,同时更容易接触到从业者谁有有限的计算时间。水力模型和总不确定性将被量化;创建一个框架,充分评估总模型的不确定性。随着气候的不断变化和更加不可预测,更清楚地了解不确定性的能力可以防止经济,社会和环境损失。这项研究可用于在英国和国外的进一步研究。
英文摘要
Floods have an enormous impact worldwide. In the UK the 2015/16 floods caused more than £1.3 billion worth of damage. The consensus of current research on climate change and its effect on future flooding hazards is that in the UK floods are going to become more frequent and more extreme. The ability to properly safeguard against such natural disasters will reduce the economical and social impacts occurring and protect future generations. In modelling flood hazards the process takes regional climate models (RCM) as input for hydrological models. These are then analysed using extreme value theorem giving inputs into the hydraulic model. Finally, the hydraulic model output is produces probabilistic maps of flooding in a given area. At each stage there is uncertainty in the form of input (RCM's), structure (hydraulic model), and parameters (friction coefficient). This results in a cascade of uncertainty through the system. The aim of uncertainty quantification is to identify sources of uncertainty and understand how it cascades through the model framework.When decisions are being made it is important to fully understand the total uncertainty associated with the system. Probabilistic maps are used to create regions in which there is a given probability of flooding. This results in a better understanding of possible future scenarios compared to deterministic methods. Floods are inherently uncertain and as such flood risk management must take uncertainty into account. Investigating and quantifying the uncertainty associated within probabilistic mapping has become an area of interest in flood inundation modelling. However, industrial and academic researchers alike have been validating and verifying hydraulic models but running a limited number of simulations. This does not account for structural or input uncertainty in the hydraulic model. Therefore, there is a need for Monte Carlo type approaches. Increasing the dimensionality of the hydraulic model reduces the structural uncertainty and creates a more realistic output but takes more time to run. Thus, a comparison of 1D/2D hybrid and fully 2D hydraulic model outputs and structural uncertainties will help with deciding which is best suited for different studies.Different sampling techniques and computational cost reduction methods can be implemented to speed up run time: Latin hypercube sampling, Multi-level Monte Carlo, Markov chain Monte Carlo, and Multi-level Markov chain Monte Carlo will all be investigated and compared. These approaches reduce the computational cost due to an increase in convergence rates while increasing accuracy compared to the simple Monte Carlo method. Utilising surrogate models will be explored as they can run faster while maintaining the required accuracy by extrapolating model outputs. The surrogate models can also be used for uncertainty propagation through the system and sensitivity analysis.The application of these improvements to the hydraulic modelling process and the variance reduction techniques will result in a more accurate probabilistic map of case studies in the UK, while being more accessible to practitioners who have limited computational time. The hydraulic model and total uncertainty will be quantified; creating a framework that sufficiently assesses total model uncertainties. With a changing and more unpredictable climate the ability to have a more clear understanding of uncertainties could prevent economical, social, and environmental losses. This research can be used for further studies across the UK and abroad.
期刊论文(5)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
River Flow 2020
2020年河流流量
DOI: 10.1201/b22619-122
发表时间: 2020
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Dolcetti G]
通讯作者: Dolcetti G
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences11010033
发表时间: 2021-01
期刊: Geosciences
影响因子: 2.7
作者: [C. Ellis;A. Visser-Quinn;G. Aitken;L. Beevers]
通讯作者: C. Ellis;A. Visser-Quinn;G. Aitken;L. Beevers
Quantification of Uncertainty Sources in Hydraulic Modelling in a Climate Change Impact Framework
气候变化影响框架中水力模型不确定性源的量化
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者: [Aitken G]
通讯作者: Aitken G
The influence of climate model uncertainty on fluvial flood hazard estimation
气候模型不确定性对河流洪水灾害估算的影响
DOI: --
发表时间: 2020
期刊: Natural Hazards
影响因子: 3.7
作者: [Beever L]
通讯作者: Beever L
海外基金