Chrysalis Boy - An Autoethnographic Investigation Of The Workings Of Exclusion

在“资本主义和同性恋身份”，斯蒂芬Valocchi（2020年）研究如何同性恋身份的当代理解主要反映了关注的白色，中产阶级，同性恋自我定义的男人，因为他们谈判的社会挑战，特别是在LGBTQ民权运动的早期阶段面临的。主流LGBT组织的领导人主要来自白色职业中产阶级，代表了LGBT人群的整体。这一点在男同性恋文学中尤为明显。艾伦·霍林赫斯特、亚当·马斯-琼斯、埃德蒙·白色和安德烈·阿西曼等小说家的作品在同质性方面令人失望。我建议用我自己的工人阶级的生活叙事，同性恋生活作为另一种形象。

In 'Capitalisms And Gay Identities', Stephen Valocchi (2020) examines how contemporary understandings of gay identity primarily reflect the concerns of white, middle class, homosexually self defining men as they negotiated the social challenges that faced them in particular in the early stages of the LGBTQ civil rights movement. Leaders of mainstream LGBT organisations have predominantly been drawn from white, professional middle classes to stand as representative of the totality of LGBTQ people. This partiality is particularly apparent in gay men's literature. The works of novelists such as Alan Hollinghurst, Adam Mars-Jones, Edmund White and Andre Aciman are disappointing in their homogeneity. I propose a life writing narrative of my own working class, gay life as an alternative image.