Wabanaki Research Review Board
Wabanaki Research Review Board
批准号:
10223043
负责人:
REBECCA PETRIE
金额:
$19.27万
依托单位国家:
美国
项目类别:
财政年份:
2021
资助国家:
美国
项目状态:
未结题
起止时间:
2021-09-16 至 2025-07-31
关键词:
AddressAmerican IndiansAreaCommunitiesCommunity HealthConflict (Psychology)ConsentDataEducationEnsureEthicsFundingFutureFuture GenerationsGovernmentGrantHealthHelicopterHoultonHuman Subject ResearchIndividualInstitutional Review BoardsKnowledgeLawsLeadershipLightMaineMainstreamingNative American Research Center for HealthNative-BornOwnershipPathway interactionsPenobscotPoliciesPolicy CompliancePovertyProceduresProcessPublic HealthPublicationsRegulationResearchResearch InstituteResearch PersonnelReservationsRewardsRuralSocial ProtectionSpecimenStandardizationStigmatizationTerminologyTimeTribal CouncilTribesTrustUnited States Public Health ServiceUniversitiesWashingtoncommunity based researchcultural competencedata integritydata sharingdesignfederal policyflyhealth disparityhealth organizationhuman subjecthuman subject protectionimprovedinterestmemberpublic health researchresponsible research conductsocial groupstemtribal communitytribal healthtribal membertribal organizationurban Native American
中文摘要
能力建设项目2:摘要
许多美国印第安人社区对研究持怀疑态度,甚至坦率地表示不信任,部分原因是
历史上,研究一直是在社区内或社区上进行的,而不是与社区一起进行的。“直升机研究”是一个术语。
用于原住民社区,用来形容调查人员飞进飞出,停留的时间只够收集数据。
虽然研究人员得到了资金和出版物的奖励,但原住民仍在与贫困作斗争
和健康差距。土著社区和研究人员之间的紧张关系通常是由冲突引起的
对研究主题的优先顺序、研究议程以及数据的使用和所有权的看法,特别是
关于同意、保密、二次使用标本、将结果退还给捐赠者等问题,有必要
用于出版物的预先审查和数据共享。鉴于这种可以理解的担忧,调查人员
已经被建议考虑群体伤害的概念,并扩大对部落研究的监管
除了对个人的保护,还包括对社会群体的保护。其他重要问题包括
土著社区的污名化、研究的相关性和适用性及其对未来的益处
几代人,以及对社区成员可以理解的研究信息的需求。这些
担忧导致不愿从事研究,除非社区自己参与一项
研究的设计、实施和规范。当这些担忧通过监管解决时
研究,社区参与,提高研究人员的文化能力,以及研究的透明度
程序,研究可以是富有成效的。不幸的环境和由此产生的担忧的遗留问题
催生了一个部落监督和监管的新时代,部落研究的数量不断增加就是明证
审查委员会及其在印度城市卫生组织中的对应机构。因此,Wabanaki Public
健康是一个部落创建并指导的公共卫生区,为缅因州的4个联邦承认的部落提供服务,
寻求建立Wabanaki研究审查委员会。研究评审委员会将及时和
深思熟虑的审查,帮助调查人员驾驭管理人类受试者研究的法规,并充当
Wabanaki公共卫生和4个部落当前和未来监管需求的综合途径。我们的
具体目标是:1)建立一个部落研究审查委员会,以增强4名和巴纳基人的能力
部落自治,支持和教育调查人员和瓦巴纳基部落成员,并最大限度地减少研究-
相关的社区危害;2)确保数据的完整性,遵守部落和联邦政策,并提供保护
3)教育和巴纳基公共卫生领导人和工作人员,并确定战略,以维持
研究审查委员会在拨款结束后成立。Wabanaki研究审查委员会承诺将
Wabanaki公共卫生规范研究和建立地区性研究的努力产生了深远的影响
进取号。能力建设项目2的协作设计将鼓励高质量、部落规则、
以社区为基础的研究,改善4个和巴纳基部落的健康。
英文摘要
CAPACITY BUILDING PROJECT 2: ABSTRACT
Many American Indian communities view research with skepticism and even frank mistrust, in part because
research has historically been done in or on communities rather than with them. “Helicopter research” is a term
used in Native communities to describe investigators who fly in and out, staying only long enough to collect data.
While researchers are rewarded with funding and publications, Native people continue to struggle with poverty
and health disparities. Tensions between Native communities and researchers generally arise from conflicting
views about the priority of topics to study, research agendas, and the use and ownership of data, particularly
regarding issues of consent, confidentiality, secondary use of specimens, returning results to donors, the need
for advance review of publications, and data sharing. In light of such understandable concerns, investigators
have been advised to consider the concept of group harm and to extend regulatory oversight for tribal research
beyond the protection of individuals to include the protection of social groups. Other important concerns include
stigmatization of Native communities, relevance and applicability of the studies and their benefit for future
generations, and the need for information on research that community members can understand. These
concerns have led to reluctance to engage in research, unless the communities themselves participate in a
study’s design, implementation, and regulation. When these concerns are addressed through regulating
research, engaging communities, improving cultural competency of researchers, and transparency of research
procedures, research can be fruitful. The legacy of unfortunate circumstances and the resulting concerns have
spawned a new era of tribal oversight and regulation, manifested by the growing number of tribal Research
Review Boards, and their counterparts in urban Indian health organizations. Accordingly, Wabanaki Public
Health, a tribally founded and directed public health district serving the 4 federally recognized tribes in Maine,
seeks to establish a Wabanaki Research Review Board. The Research Review Board will facilitate timely and
thoughtful reviews, help investigators navigate regulations governing human subjects research, and serve as an
integrated pathway for current and future regulatory needs of Wabanaki Public Health and the 4 tribes. Our
Specific Aims are to: 1) Build a tribal Research Review Board that will augment the capacity of the 4 Wabanaki
tribes to self-govern, support and educate investigators and Wabanaki tribal members, and minimize research-
related community harm; 2) Ensure integrity of data, compliance with tribal and federal policies, and protection
of human subjects; and 3) Educate Wabanaki Public Health leaders and staff and identify strategies to sustain
the Research Review Board after grant funding ends. The Wabanaki Research Review Board promises to have
far reaching impact on Wabanaki Public Health’s efforts to regulate research and build the regional research
enterprise. The collaborative design of Capacity Building Project 2 will encourage high-quality, tribally regulated,
community-based research that improves the health of the 4 Wabanaki tribes.
期刊论文(0)
专著(0)
科研奖励(0)
会议论文
Wabanaki Grants, Epidemiology, Analysis, Research Design, and Undergraduate Program
-
批准号:10708915
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$29.66万
-
财政年份:2021
-
负责人:REBECCA PETRIE
-
依托单位:
Wabanaki Research Review Board
-
批准号:10708916
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$18.92万
-
财政年份:2021
-
负责人:REBECCA PETRIE
-
依托单位:
Wabanaki Grants, Epidemiology, Analysis, Research Design, and Undergraduate Program
-
批准号:10223042
-
项目类别:
-
资助金额:$31.84万
-
财政年份:2021
-
负责人:REBECCA PETRIE
-
依托单位:
海外基金