A memory-retrieval view of discourse representation: The recollection and familiarity of text ideas.
A memory-retrieval view of discourse representation: The recollection and familiarity of text ideas.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/01690965.2011.587992
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jonathan E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Long DL;Johns CL;Jonathan E
根据大多数语篇理解理论，读者在记忆中构建并储存了至少两种相互关联的表征：包含语篇中明确思想的语篇基础和包含语篇整体意义或“主旨”的语篇模型。作者提出了一种改进的这种观点，其中文本表示区分编码和检索过程。一些编码过程将文本中的概念“单元化”，而一些编码过程将单元彼此“关联”。在再认过程中，基于熟悉性过程提取单位，而基于回忆性过程提取相关单位。这一区别在两个实验中得到了检验。在实验1中，读者理解句子对，其中一些可以通过因果推理相关，而其他人只是时间相关。在这两种情况下，总体认知度都很高，但回忆比熟悉度更敏感。在实验二中，句子以定冠词开头作为连接名词短语的语言线索，或者以不定冠词开头。语篇操纵对记忆的影响最大。作者认为，话语模式可能是一个文本的想法，可用于检索意识的集合。文本的gist级表示可能不是预先存储的结构;相反，它可能部分地作为回忆的文本想法的摘要描述而生成。
According to most theories of text comprehension, readers construct and store in memory at least two inter-related representations: a text base containing the explicit ideas in a text and a discourse model that contains the overall meaning or “gist” of a text. The authors propose a refinement of this view in which text representations are distinguished by both encoding and retrieval processes. Some encoding processes “unitize” concepts in a text and some “relate” units to one another. Units are retrieved based on familiarity processes in recognition, whereas related units are retrieved based on recollective processes. This distinction was tested in two experiments. In Experiment 1, readers comprehended sentence pairs in which some could be related by means of a causal inference, whereas others were only temporally related. Overall recognition was high in both conditions, but recollection, much more than familiarity, was sensitive to the causal manipulation. In Experiment 2, sentences began with a definite article as a linguistic cue to connect noun phrases or began with an indefinite article. The discourse manipulation had its primary influence on recollection. The authors suggest that the discourse model may be a collection of text ideas that are available to consciousness at retrieval. The gist-level representation of a text may not be a pre-stored structure; rather, it may be generated, in part, as a summary description of recollected text ideas.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730
发表时间：
2008-07
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
Diana RA;Yonelinas AP;Ranganath C
通讯作者：
Ranganath C
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Giovanello, Kelly Sullivan;Keane, Margaret A.;Verfaellie, Mieke
通讯作者：
Verfaellie, Mieke
影响因子：
2.4
作者：
GARDINER, JM
通讯作者：
GARDINER, JM
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Geraci, Lisa;McCabe, David R.
通讯作者：
McCabe, David R.
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.96.10.5884
发表时间：
1999-05-11
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Henke, K;Weber, B;Buck, A
通讯作者：
Buck, A