The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises

The impact of China's carbon allowance allocation rules on the product prices and emission reduction behaviors of ETS-covered enterprises
复制标题

中国碳配额分配规则对ETS企业产品价格和减排行为的影响

DOI:
10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.004
复制
发表时间:
2015-11
期刊:
影响因子:
9
通讯作者:
Tan, Weiping
Tan, Weiping
中科院分区:
经济学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang, Ao-Dong;Wang, Ao-Dong;Tan, Weiping;Tan, Weiping

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

分配碳排放额度是中国实现碳减排目标、建立碳交易市场的一项重要任务。中国在七个试点地区内设计了几个分配规则。这些规则会产生怎样的影响,不仅与排污权交易计划(ETS)覆盖的企业参与碳市场的积极性密切相关,更重要的是与碳市场的机制设计和可持续发展密切相关。为此,建立了多阶段利润模型,分析了ETS覆盖企业在不同分配规则下的产品价格和减排行为。研究结果表明,首先,在祖父、自我申报和拍卖规则下,企业在确定最优产品价格和最优碳减排时,可能关注的是当期利润最大化;而在标杆规则下,这些企业可能更关心当期决策对下一阶段利润的影响。第二,最优产品价格政策与同类产品价格、消费者低碳意识、政府补贴正相关。最后,随着碳价格的提高,消费者的低碳意识和政府补贴,以及碳排放上限的降低,这些企业有减少碳排放的趋势。
It is an important task for China to allocate carbon emission allowance to realize its carbon reduction target and establish carbon trading market. China has designed several allocation rules within seven pilot regions. What influence those rules may cause is closely related with the enthusiasm of emission trading scheme (ETS) covered enterprises' participation in carbon market, and more importantly, with the mechanism design and sustainable development of carbon market. For this purpose, the multi-stage profit model is developed to analyze the ETS-covered enterprises' product prices and emission reduction behaviors under different allocation rules. The results show that, first, under the rules of grandfathering, self-declaration and auctioning, when deciding the optimal product price and optimal carbon emission reduction, those enterprises may focus on maximizing current stage profit; however, under the rule of benchmarking, those enterprises may care more about the impact of current decisions on the profit in next stage. Second, the optimal product price policy is positively correlated with the price of the same kind products, consumers' low-carbon awareness and government subsidy. Finally, along with the increase of carbon price, consumers' low-carbon awareness and government subsidy and the decrease of carbon emission cap, those enterprises tend to reduce carbon emissions.
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.035
发表时间: 2015-02
期刊: Energy Policy
影响因子: 9
作者:
Shiwei Yu;Junjie Zhang;Shuhong Zheng;Han Sun
通讯作者: Han Sun
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00100-8
发表时间: 2002-03-01
期刊: ENERGY POLICY
影响因子: 9
作者:
Cramton, P;Kerr, S
通讯作者: Kerr, S
DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2002.0209
发表时间: 2002-01
期刊: Climate Policy
影响因子: 7.1
作者:
H. Groenenberg;K. Blok
通讯作者: H. Groenenberg;K. Blok
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008216524348
发表时间: 1998-04
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
John C. V. Pezzey;A. Park
通讯作者: John C. V. Pezzey;A. Park
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.042
发表时间: 2012-07
期刊: Energy Policy
影响因子: 9
作者:
B. Ruijven;M. Weitzel;M. Elzen;A. Hof;D. P. Vuuren;Sonja Peterson;Daiju Narita
通讯作者: B. Ruijven;M. Weitzel;M. Elzen;A. Hof;D. P. Vuuren;Sonja Peterson;Daiju Narita