Restriction and recruitment-gene duplication and the origin and evolution of snake venom toxins.
Restriction and recruitment-gene duplication and the origin and evolution of snake venom toxins.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/gbe/evu166
复制
发表时间:
2014-08
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Mulley JF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hargreaves AD;Swain MT;Hegarty MJ;Logan DW;Mulley JF
Snake venom has been hypothesized to have originated and diversified through a process that involves duplication of genes encoding body proteins with subsequent recruitment of the copy to the venom gland, where natural selection acts to develop or increase toxicity. However, gene duplication is known to be a rare event in vertebrate genomes, and the recruitment of duplicated genes to a novel expression domain (neofunctionalization) is an even rarer process that requires the evolution of novel combinations of transcription factor binding sites in upstream regulatory regions. Therefore, although this hypothesis concerning the evolution of snake venom is very unlikely and should be regarded with caution, it is nonetheless often assumed to be established fact, hindering research into the true origins of snake venom toxins. To critically evaluate this hypothesis, we have generated transcriptomic data for body tissues and salivary and venom glands from five species of venomous and nonvenomous reptiles. Our comparative transcriptomic analysis of these data reveals that snake venom does not evolve through the hypothesized process of duplication and recruitment of genes encoding body proteins. Indeed, our results show that many proposed venom toxins are in fact expressed in a wide variety of body tissues, including the salivary gland of nonvenomous reptiles and that these genes have therefore been restricted to the venom gland following duplication, not recruited. Thus, snake venom evolves through the duplication and subfunctionalization of genes encoding existing salivary proteins. These results highlight the danger of the elegant and intuitive “just-so story” in evolutionary biology.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Fry, Bryan G.;Scheib, Holger;Casewell, Nicholas R.
通讯作者:
Casewell, Nicholas R.
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Fry, Bryan G.;Casewell, Nicholas R.;Jackson, Timothy N. W.
通讯作者:
Jackson, Timothy N. W.
DOI:
10.1098/rspb.2004.2969
发表时间:
2005-02-07
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Cotton, JA;Page, RDM
通讯作者:
Page, RDM
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Fahmi, Laila;Makran, Bouchra;Calvete, Juan J.
通讯作者:
Calvete, Juan J.
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Fry, BG;Vidal, N;Kochva, E
通讯作者:
Kochva, E