21st century neurobehavioral theories of decision making in addiction: Review and evaluation.
21st century neurobehavioral theories of decision making in addiction: Review and evaluation.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.pbb.2017.09.009
复制
发表时间：
2018-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Pope DA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bickel WK;Mellis AM;Snider SE;Athamneh LN;Stein JS;Pope DA
这篇评论批判性地探讨了神经行为理论在21世纪世纪成瘾决策中的发展。我们具体比较了每一个理论审查的七个基准的理论的鲁棒性，根据他们的解决能力：为什么有些商品是上瘾的;成瘾的发展趋势;成瘾相关的快感缺失;自我挫败的行为模式成瘾;为什么成瘾与其他不健康的行为同时发生;最后，成瘾的修复手段。我们只包括自包含的理论或假设，这些理论或假设在21世纪世纪发展或扩展，以解决成瘾的决策问题。因此，我们回顾了七种不同的成瘾决策理论：学习理论，激励-敏化理论，多巴胺失衡和系统模型，对手过程理论，自我控制失败的力量模型，竞争性神经行为决策系统理论和成瘾的三元系统理论。最后，我们根据上述基准直接比较了这些理论的性能，并强调了几种理论合并的关键点。
This review critically examines neurobehavioral theoretical developments in decision making in addiction in the 21st century. We specifically compare each theory reviewed to seven benchmarks of theoretical robustness, based on their ability to address: why some commodities are addictive; developmental trends in addiction; addiction-related anhedonia; self-defeating patterns of behavior in addiction; why addiction co-occurs with other unhealthy behaviors; and, finally, means for the repair of addiction. We have included only self-contained theories or hypotheses which have been developed or extended in the 21st century to address decision making in addiction. We thus review seven distinct theories of decision making in addiction: learning theories, incentive-sensitization theory, dopamine imbalance and systems models, opponent process theory, strength models of self-control failure, the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory, and the triadic systems theory of addiction. Finally, we have directly compared the performance of each of these theories based on the aforementioned benchmarks, and highlighted key points at which several theories have coalesced.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
1.1
作者：
Bechara, A;Damasio, AR
通讯作者：
Damasio, AR
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
Bickel, W. K.;Snider, S. E.;Stein, J. S.
通讯作者：
Stein, J. S.
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x
发表时间：
2007-12-01
影响因子：
7.2
作者：
Baumeister, Roy F.;Vohs, Kathleen D.;Tice, Dianne M.
通讯作者：
Tice, Dianne M.
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Alessi, SM;Petry, NM
通讯作者：
Petry, NM
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Baumeister, Roy F.;Vonasch, Andrew J.
通讯作者：
Vonasch, Andrew J.