Electrophysiological Evidence for Early and Interactive Symbol Access and Rule Processing in Retrieving and Combining Language Constructions

Electrophysiological Evidence for Early and Interactive Symbol Access and Rule Processing in Retrieving and Combining Language Constructions
复制标题

检索和组合语言结构中早期和交互式符号访问和规则处理的电生理学证据

DOI:
10.1162/jocn_a_01038
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Pulvermüller
Pulvermüller
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lucchese;Autenrieb;Miller;Pulvermüller

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

人类大脑储存了大量的语言符号(词素、单词),并将它们组合成一组几乎无限的格式良好的字符串(短语、句子),作为有效的交流工具。然而,如果字符串包含无意义的项(例如,“伪同形词”),或者如果违反了组合字符串元素的规则。先前的研究表明,当参与者在语言任务中专注地处理句子时,句法处理可能发生得很早,但词汇语义处理或任何涉及这一因素的互动都是在稍后的时间表现出来的。400毫秒或更晚)。相比之下,最近的证据表明,被动言语感知范式的组合(形态句法)和存储相关的(词汇语义)属性的早期处理。一个关键的问题是,这些并行的过程是否也可能在处理的早期相互作用。使用ERPs在正交设计中,我们提出了口语单词串的参与者,而他们从传入的语音分心,以获得信息的自动语言处理机制不受任务相关的策略。刺激是(1)格式良好的微型构式(短的代词-动词句子),(2)“未存储”的字符串包含一个假语素,(3)“组合不良”的字符串违反主谓一致规则,或(4)双重违反,包括两种类型的错误。我们发现,由70-210毫秒后,发作的短语,最后的音节,消除歧义的字符串,词汇语义和形态句法异常的相互作用是显而易见的ERPs。这些结果反对词汇储存、形态句法组合及其相互作用的串行加工,而支持符号及其组合结构的早期、同时和交互加工。
The human brain stores an immense repertoire of linguistic symbols (morphemes, words) and combines them into a virtually unlimited set of well-formed strings (phrases, sentences) that serve as efficient communicative tools. Communication is hampered, however, if strings include meaningless items (e.g., “pseudomorphemes”), or if the rules for combining string elements are violated. Prior research suggests that, when participants attentively process sentences in a linguistic task, syntactic processing can occur quite early, but lexicosemantic processing, or any interaction involving this factor, is manifest later in time (ca. 400 msec or later). In contrast, recent evidence from passive speech perception paradigms suggests early processing of both combinatorial (morphosyntactic) and storage-related (lexicosemantic) properties. A crucial question is whether these parallel processes might also interact early in processing. Using ERPs in an orthogonal design, we presented spoken word strings to participants while they were distracted from incoming speech to obtain information about automatic language processing mechanisms unaffected by task-related strategies. Stimuli were either (1) well-formed miniconstructions (short pronoun–verb sentences), (2) “unstored” strings containing a pseudomorpheme, (3) “ill-combined” strings violating subject–verb agreement rules, or (4) double violations including both types of errors. We found that by 70–210 msec after the onset of the phrase-final syllable that disambiguated the strings, interactions of lexicosemantic and morphosyntactic deviance were evident in the ERPs. These results argue against serial processing of lexical storage, morphosyntactic combination and their interaction, and in favor of early, simultaneous, and interactive processing of symbols and their combinatorial structures.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
发表时间: 2011
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
Kutas M;Federmeier KD
通讯作者: Federmeier KD
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00886
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Hanna J;Pulvermüller F
通讯作者: Pulvermüller F
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Y. Shtyrov;A. Butorina;A. Nikolaeva;T. Stroganova
通讯作者: T. Stroganova
语言、意识、文化:心理结构论文
DOI: 10.5860/choice.45-4908
发表时间: 2007
期刊: Biochimica et biophysica acta
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Jackendoff
通讯作者: R. Jackendoff
什么是人类语言能力?:两种观点
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Jackendoff
通讯作者: R. Jackendoff