Infants infer potential social partners by observing the interactions of their parent with unknown others.

Infants infer potential social partners by observing the interactions of their parent with unknown others.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2121390119
复制
发表时间:
2022-08-09
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
--
中科院分区:
综合性期刊1区
文献类型:
--
作者:

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

尽管对社会知识的发展进行了数十年的研究,但很少有实验测试婴儿如何从照顾者的行为中了解新的个体。在这里,我们表明,婴儿通过观察父母与以前未知的人的互动来了解谁是潜在的社会伙伴。婴儿出生在社会联系的个人网络中。婴儿如何开始学习哪些个体是他们自己潜在的社会伙伴?使用数字编辑的视频,我们展示了12个月大的婴儿在陌生人和他们自己的父母之间的社交互动。在研究1到4中,当父母对一个木偶表现出从属关系后,婴儿期望那个木偶与他们互动。在第五项研究中,婴儿做出了相反的推理;在木偶与他们互动后,婴儿期望木偶对他们的父母做出回应。在每一项研究中,婴儿的推理都是针对他们自己的父母而不是另一个婴儿的父母的社会互动。因此,婴儿联合收割机将社会互动的观察与他们与父母先前存在的关系的知识结合起来,以发现哪些新遇到的个体是他们自己和他们家庭的潜在社会伙伴。
Despite decades of research on the development of social knowledge, few experiments have tested how infants learn about new individuals from the behavior of their caregivers. Here, we show that infants learn who is a potential social partner by observing their parents’ interactions with previously unknown individuals. Infants are born into networks of individuals who are socially connected. How do infants begin learning which individuals are their own potential social partners? Using digitally edited videos, we showed 12-mo-old infants’ social interactions between unknown individuals and their own parents. In studies 1 to 4, after their parent showed affiliation toward one puppet, infants expected that puppet to engage with them. In study 5, infants made the reverse inference; after a puppet engaged with them, the infants expected that puppet to respond to their parent. In each study, infants’ inferences were specific to social interactions that involved their own parent as opposed to another infant’s parent. Thus, infants combine observation of social interactions with knowledge of their preexisting relationship with their parent to discover which newly encountered individuals are potential social partners for themselves and their families.
DOI: 10.1177/2515245920974622
发表时间: 2021-01
影响因子: 13.6
作者:
Byers-Heinlein, Krista;Tsui, Angeline Sin Mei;Bergmann, Christina;Black, Alexis K.;Brown, Anna;Carbajal, Maria Julia;Durrant, Samantha;Fennell, Christopher T.;Fievet, Anne-Caroline;Frank, Michael C.;Gampe, Anja;Gervain, Judit;Gonzalez-Gomez, Nayeli;Hamlin, J. Kiley;Havron, Naomi;Hernik, Mikolaj;Kerr, Shila;Killam, Hilary;Klassen, Kelsey;Kosie, Jessica E.;Kovacs, Agnes Melinda;Lew-Williams, Casey;Liu, Liquan;Mani, Nivedita;Marino, Caterina;Mastroberardino, Meghan;Mateu, Victoria;Noble, Claire;Orena, Adriel John;Polka, Linda;Potter, Christine E.;Schreiner, Melanie S.;Singh, Leher;Soderstrom, Melanie;Sundara, Megha;Waddell, Connor;Werker, Janet F.;Wermelinger, Stephanie
通讯作者: Wermelinger, Stephanie
DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01112.x
发表时间: 2010-07-01
期刊: COGNITIVE SCIENCE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Johnson, Susan C.;Dweck, Carol S.;Barth, Maria
通讯作者: Barth, Maria
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719445115
发表时间: 2018-03-13
影响因子: 11.1
作者:
Bian, Lin;Sloane, Stephanie;Baillargeon, Renee
通讯作者: Baillargeon, Renee
DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2014.883636
发表时间: 2014-03-04
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Groh, Ashley M.;Fearon, R. Pasco;Roisman, Glenn I.
通讯作者: Roisman, Glenn I.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093659
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
Gelman SA
通讯作者: Gelman SA