Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.
Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis.
复制标题
风险选择的年龄差异：荟萃分析。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x
复制
发表时间：
2011-10
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Hertwig R
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mata R;Josef AK;Samanez-Larkin GR;Hertwig R
冒险行为会随着年龄的变化而变化吗？我们进行了系统的文献检索，发现年轻人和老年人在行为任务上进行了 29 项比较，这些任务被认为可以衡量冒险行为 (N = 4,093)。这些报告依赖于在几个方面有所不同的各种任务，例如所需的学习量或选择框架（收益与损失）。结果表明，与年龄相关的差异随着任务特征的变化而变化很大，特别是任务的学习要求。在经验决策中，与年龄相关的风险承担差异是学习成绩下降的函数：当学习导致风险规避行为时，老年人比年轻人更倾向于冒险，但当学习导致风险寻求行为时，老年人更厌恶风险。在根据描述做出的决策中，年轻人和老年人在大多数任务中表现出相似的冒险行为，并且作为得/失框架的函数，不存在明显的与年龄相关的差异。我们讨论了过去研究的局限性和优点，并为未来关于与年龄相关的风险承担差异的工作提供了建议。
Does risk taking change as a function of age? We conducted a systematic literature search and found 29 comparisons between younger and older adults on behavioral tasks thought to measure risk taking (N =4,093). The reports relied on various tasks differing in several respects, such as the amount of learning required or the choice framing (gains vs. losses). The results suggest that age-related differences vary considerably as a function of task characteristics, in particular the learning requirements of the task. In decisions from experience, age-related differences in risk taking were a function of decreased learning performance: older adults were more risk seeking compared to younger adults when learning led to risk-avoidant behavior, but were more risk averse when learning led to risk-seeking behavior. In decisions from description, younger adults and older adults showed similar risk-taking behavior for the majority of the tasks, and there were no clear age-related differences as a function of gain/loss framing. We discuss limitations and strengths of past research and provide suggestions for future work on age-related differences in risk taking.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
8.2
作者：
Hills, Thomas T.;Hertwig, Ralph
通讯作者：
Hertwig, Ralph
DOI：
10.2190/139a-98ax-el11-d120
发表时间：
1988-01-01
影响因子：
2
作者：
HOLLIDAY, SG
通讯作者：
HOLLIDAY, SG
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Baena, Elsa;Allen, Philip A.;Hall, Rosalie J.
通讯作者：
Hall, Rosalie J.
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Eppinger B;Hämmerer D;Li SC
通讯作者：
Li SC
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Brandstätter E;Gigerenzer G;Hertwig R
通讯作者：
Hertwig R