TLR4 ligands lipopolysaccharide and monophosphoryl lipid a differentially regulate effector and memory CD8+ T Cell differentiation.

TLR4 ligands lipopolysaccharide and monophosphoryl lipid a differentially regulate effector and memory CD8+ T Cell differentiation.
复制标题

DOI:
10.4049/jimmunol.1302569
复制
发表时间:
2014-05-01
期刊:
Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Kaech SM
Kaech SM
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cui W;Joshi NS;Liu Y;Meng H;Kleinstein SH;Kaech SM

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

用非复制性病原体配制的疫苗需要佐剂来帮助增强免疫原性。佐剂在抗体产生中的作用已经得到了很好的研究,但它们如何影响记忆性CD 8 + T细胞分化仍然不清楚。在这里,我们实施了树突状细胞(DC)介导的免疫,研究常用的佐剂,TLR配体,对小鼠效应和记忆CD 8 + T细胞分化的影响。有趣的是,我们发现TLR 4配体LPS在免疫后产生记忆性CD 8 + T细胞方面远比其他TLR配体更上级。LPS促进克隆扩增类似于其他佐剂,但较少的活化的CD 8 + T细胞在收缩期间死亡,产生更大的记忆细胞库。令人惊讶的是,单磷酰脂质A(MPLA),另一种TLR 4配体,增强了效应CD 8 + T细胞的克隆扩增,但也促进了它们的终末分化和收缩;因此,形成的记忆CD 8 + T细胞较少,并且与LPS引发的动物相比,MPLA引发的动物对继发性感染的保护较少。此外,基因表达谱显示LPS引发的效应细胞显示出更强的促记忆基因表达特征,而MPLA引发的效应细胞的基因表达谱与末端效应CD 8 + T细胞更接近。最后,我们证明了LPS-TLR 4衍生的“促记忆”信号是MyD 88依赖性的,而不是Trif依赖性的。这项研究揭示了佐剂对CD 8 + T细胞记忆的数量和质量的影响力,并且注意佐剂的选择至关重要,因为促进效应细胞扩增可能并不总是等同于更多的记忆T细胞或更大的保护。
Vaccines formulated with non-replicating pathogens require adjuvants to help bolster immunogenicity. The role of adjuvants in antibody production has been well studied, but how they influence memory CD8+ T cell differentiation remains poorly defined. Here we implemented dendritic cell (DC)-mediated immunization to study the effects of commonly used adjuvants, TLR ligands, on effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation in mice. Intriguingly, we found that the TLR4 ligand LPS was far more superior to other TLR ligands in generating memory CD8+ T cells upon immunization. LPS boosted clonal expansion similar to the other adjuvants, but fewer of the activated CD8+ T cells died during contraction, generating a larger pool of memory cells. Surprisingly, monophosphoryl lipid A (MPLA), another TLR4 ligand, enhanced clonal expansion of effector CD8+ T cells, but also promoted their terminal differentiation and contraction; thus, fewer memory CD8+ T cells formed and MPLA-primed animals were less protected against secondary infection compared to those primed with LPS. Furthermore, gene expression profiling revealed that LPS-primed effector cells displayed a stronger pro-memory gene expression signature, whereas the gene expression profile of MPLA-primed effector cells aligned closer with terminal effector CD8+ T cells. Lastly, we demonstrated that the LPS-TLR4-derived “pro-memory” signals were MyD88, but not Trif, dependent. This study reveals the influential power of adjuvants on the quantity and quality of CD8+ T cell memory, and that attention to adjuvant selection is crucial because boosting effector cell expansion may not always equate with more memory T cells or greater protection.
DOI: 10.1038/ni.2536
发表时间: 2013-04
期刊: Nature immunology
影响因子: 30.5
作者:
通讯作者: --
DOI: 10.1038/ni1009
发表时间: 2003-12-01
期刊: NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
影响因子: 30.5
作者:
Kaech, SM;Tan, JT;Ahmed, R
通讯作者: Ahmed, R
DOI: 10.1038/nm1257
发表时间: 2005-07-01
期刊: NATURE MEDICINE
影响因子: 82.9
作者:
Badovinac, VP;Messingham, KAN;Harty, JT
通讯作者: Harty, JT
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.2.778
发表时间: 2007-01-15
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
Castellino, Flora;Germain, Ronald N.
通讯作者: Germain, Ronald N.
DOI: 10.1038/ni804
发表时间: 2002-07-01
期刊: NATURE IMMUNOLOGY
影响因子: 30.5
作者:
Badovinac, VP;Porter, BB;Harty, JT
通讯作者: Harty, JT