A Psychometric Framework for the Evaluation of Instructional Sensitivity

A Psychometric Framework for the Evaluation of Instructional Sensitivity
复制标题

评估教学敏感性的心理测量框架

DOI:
10.1080/10627197.2016.1167591
复制
发表时间:
2016
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Klieme
Klieme
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Naumann;Hochweber;Klieme

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

虽然对教学敏感性有一个共同的理解,但它缺乏一个共同的操作。已经提出了各种方法,一些侧重于项目的反应,其他的测试分数。由于方法往往不会产生一致的结果,以前的研究已经造成的印象,教学敏感性的方法是明显分散。为了消除这种印象,我们提出了一个基于项目反应理论的框架,可以帮助我们了解现有方法之间的相似性和差异。本文以实证数据为例,提出了三种教学敏感性的观点:一种观点认为教学敏感性是发现学生在不同时间学习阶段差异的能力;第二种观点认为教学敏感性是发现接受不同教学的群体之间差异的能力。对于第三个角度,将前两个结合起来考虑时间点和组之间的差异。我们将讨论将敏感性指数与教学措施联系起来。
Although there is a common understanding of instructional sensitivity, it lacks a common operationalization. Various approaches have been proposed, some focusing on item responses, others on test scores. As approaches often do not produce consistent results, previous research has created the impression that approaches to instructional sensitivity are noticeably fragmented. To counter this impression, we present an item response theory–based framework that can help us to understand similarities and differences between existing approaches. Using empirical data for illustration, this article identifiesthree perspectiveson instructional sensitivity: One perspective views instructional sensitivity as the capacity to detect differences in students' stages of learning across points of time. A second perspective treats instructional sensitivity as the capacity to detect differences between groups that have received different instruction. For a third perspective, the previous two are combined to consider differences between both time points and groups. We discuss linking sensitivity indices to measures of instruction.
在成就建模中使用特定于项目的指导信息
DOI: 10.1007/bf02294624
发表时间: 1989
期刊: Psychometrika
影响因子: 3
作者:
B. Muthén
通讯作者: B. Muthén
DOI: --
发表时间: 2008
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
�arsha Ing;Stanford
通讯作者: Stanford
Die Modellierung naturwissenschaftlicher Kompetenz im Grundschulalter。
DOI: --
发表时间: 2010
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Ilonca Hardy;Thilo Kleickmann;Susanne Koerber;D. Mayer;Kornelia Möller;Judith Pollmeier;Knut Schwippert;B. Sodian
通讯作者: B. Sodian
DOI: --
发表时间: 2011
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
S. Hertel
通讯作者: S. Hertel
DOI: --
发表时间: 2005
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Glaser
通讯作者: R. Glaser