Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.
Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.003
复制
发表时间：
2009-08-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brown-Schmidt, Sarah
在对话设置中，对话伙伴会集中在相似的名称上作为参照物。这些词汇夹带术语是建立夹带术语的特定个体之间的共同基础的一部分，并且被认为是在记忆中编码的特定于合作伙伴的线索。到目前为止，对解释的时间进程的分析表明，特定于伙伴的信息可能不会限制对指称表达的最初解释。然而，这些研究使用非互动的范式，这可能会限制使用的合作伙伴特定的表示。本文介绍了三个眼动跟踪实验的结果。实验1a使用了一种交互式对话方法，其中实验者和参与者共同建立各种图像的夹带术语。在临界试验中，同一个实验者或一个新的实验者使用一个夹带项或一个新的项来描述一个临界图像。结果表明，早期，在线合作伙伴的特定效果的夹带条款的解释，以及早期，合作伙伴的特定效果的新条款的初步证据。实验1b采用非交互式范式，参与者通过听实验1a中记录的图像描述完成相同的任务;结果表明，特定于伙伴的效应被消除。实验2复制了实验1a的合作伙伴特定的研究结果与互动的范例和场景，包含以前未提及的图像。结果表明，合作伙伴特定的解释是最有可能发生在互动对话设置的关键试验和刺激特性的数量也可能发挥作用。结果是一致的，大量的工作表明，语言处理系统使用了丰富的上下文和语用表征的来源，以指导在线处理决策。
In dialog settings, conversational partners converge on similar names for referents. These lexically entrained terms are part of the common ground between the particular individuals who established the entrained term, and are thought to be encoded in memory with a partner-specific cue. Thus far, analyses of the time-course of interpretation suggest that partner-specific information may not constrain the initial interpretation of referring expressions. However, these studies used non-interactive paradigms, which may limit the use of partner-specific representations. This article presents the results of three eye-tracking experiments. Experiment 1a used an interactive conversation methodology in which the experimenter and participant jointly established entrained terms for various images. On critical trials, the same experimenter, or a new experimenter described a critical image using an entrained term, or a new term. The results demonstrated an early, on-line partner-specific effect for interpretation of entrained terms, as well as preliminary evidence for an early, partner-specific effect for new terms. Experiment 1b used a non-interactive paradigm in which participants completed the same task by listening to image descriptions recorded during Experiment 1a; the results showed that partner-specific effects were eliminated. Experiment 2 replicated the partner-specific findings of Experiment 1a with an interactive paradigm and scenes that contained previously unmentioned images. The results suggest that partner-specific interpretation is most likely to occur in interactive dialog settings; the number of critical trials and stimulus characteristics may also play a role. The results are consistent with a large body of work demonstrating that the language processing system uses a rich source of contextual and pragmatic representations to guide on-line processing decisions.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Barr, Dale J.
通讯作者：
Barr, Dale J.
影响因子：
3.4
作者：
CLARK, HH;WILKESGIBBS, D
通讯作者：
WILKESGIBBS, D
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Barr, DJ;Keysar, B
通讯作者：
Keysar, B
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Hanna, JE;Tanenhaus, MK
通讯作者：
Tanenhaus, MK
影响因子：
4.3
作者：
Clark, HH;Krych, MA
通讯作者：
Krych, MA