Disruption Leads to Methodological and Analytic Innovation in Developmental Sciences: Recommendations for Remote Administration and Dealing With Messy Data.
Disruption Leads to Methodological and Analytic Innovation in Developmental Sciences: Recommendations for Remote Administration and Dealing With Messy Data.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732312
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Norton ES
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Krogh-Jespersen S;MacNeill LA;Anderson EL;Stroup HE;Harriott EM;Gut E;Blum A;Fareedi E;Fredian KM;Wert SL;Wakschlag LS;Norton ES
新冠肺炎大流行对发展科学纵向研究的数据收集造成了不可估量的影响。对进行面对面标准化评估的限制导致了颠覆性创新，即应用新方法来提高参与者的参与度。在这里，我们重点介绍行为评估的远程管理。我们认为，远程评估方面的这些创新应该成为发展科学新的标准协议的一部分，以促进在由于繁琐的要求(例如，多个面对面评估)而难以接触或参与的人群中收集数据。我们提出了一系列适应发展评估的方法(例如，马伦)，并详细讨论了在与大流行相关的关闭期间遇到的不太理想的情况下(即，丢失或混乱的数据)将应用的数据分析方法。归根结底，这些偏远的方法实际上加强了洞察发展中人口的能力，并促进了务实的创新，这应该会导致持久的变化。
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted data collection for longitudinal studies in developmental sciences to an immeasurable extent. Restrictions on conducting in-person standardized assessments have led to disruptive innovation, in which novel methods are applied to increase participant engagement. Here, we focus on remote administration of behavioral assessment. We argue that these innovations in remote assessment should become part of the new standard protocol in developmental sciences to facilitate data collection in populations that may be hard to reach or engage due to burdensome requirements (e.g., multiple in-person assessments). We present a series of adaptations to developmental assessments (e.g., Mullen) and a detailed discussion of data analytic approaches to be applied in the less-than-ideal circumstances encountered during the pandemic-related shutdown (i.e., missing or messy data). Ultimately, these remote approaches actually strengthen the ability to gain insight into developmental populations and foster pragmatic innovation that should result in enduring change.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1007/s42844-020-00025-3
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
Adversity and resilience science
影响因子：
--
作者：
Morris AS;Wakschlag L;Krogh-Jespersen S;Fox N;Planalp B;Perlman SB;Shuffrey LC;Smith B;Lorenzo NE;Amso D;Coles CD;Johnson SP
通讯作者：
Johnson SP
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Rowley, Stephanie J.;Camacho, Tissyana C.
通讯作者：
Camacho, Tissyana C.
影响因子：
3.1
作者：
McHenry MS;Oyungu E;Yang Z;Hines AC;Ombitsa AR;Vreeman RC;Abubakar A;Monahan PO
通讯作者：
Monahan PO
影响因子：
6.4
作者：
Enders, Craig K.
通讯作者：
Enders, Craig K.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Nielsen, Mark;Haun, Daniel;Legare, Cristine H.
通讯作者：
Legare, Cristine H.