Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles.

Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509
复制
发表时间:
2021-07-01
期刊:
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
Werner RM
Werner RM
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chatterjee P;Werner RM

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

男性和女性在高影响力医学期刊上撰写的学术论文被引用的方式是否不同?在这项对5554篇论文的横断面研究中,女性初级作者或高级作者的被引次数少于男性初级作者或高级作者的被引次数。女性作为第一作者和资深作者撰写的文章被引用的次数大约是男性作为第一作者和资深作者撰写的文章的一半。这些发现表明,论文引文中基于性别的差异可能是导致女性在学术医学领域的进步和晋升方面存在差异的关键因素。这项横断面研究评估了男性和女性撰写的高影响力医学期刊上的学术文章是否被不同地引用。女性在学术医学领域获得晋升和担任领导职位的可能性较小。学术论文被引用的频率是衡量学术影响力的一个关键指标,也是对职业发展的经常评估;然而,尚不清楚同行评议的男性和女性撰写的文章被引用的方式是否不同。评估男性和女性撰写的高影响力医学期刊上的学术论文被引用的情况是否不同。在这项对5种高影响力医学期刊(《内科医学年鉴》、《英国医学杂志》、《美国医学会杂志》、《美国医学会内科杂志》和《新英格兰医学杂志》)2015-2018年间所有原创研究和评论文章的横断面研究中,使用在线数据库确定了每篇文章的主要作者和资深作者的性别,并使用Web of Science确定了每篇文章被引用的次数。然后比较了主要作者和资深作者性别的引文数量。对2020年7月至2021年4月的数据进行了分析。初级作者和高级作者的性别。每篇文章的引文量。在5554篇论文中,女性主要作者1975篇(35.6%),资深作者1273篇(25.8%)。女性作为第一作者的原始研究论文被引用的中位数(四分位数范围)少于男性作为第一作者的文章(36篇[17-82]条对54条[22-141]条;P < .001)和资深作者(37[17-93]条对51[20-128]条;P < .001)。女性作为第一作者和资深作者撰写的文章被引用的中位数(四分位数范围)大约是男性作为第一作者和资深作者撰写的文章的一半(33[15-68]次引用vs59[23-149]次;P < .001)。在这项研究的每一年中,引用的差异仍然存在,在评论文章中不那么明显。在这项研究中,女性在高影响力医学期刊上撰写的文章被引用的次数比男性少,特别是当女性作为初级作者和高级作者一起撰写时。这些差异可能会对女性的职业成功和实现学术医学领域的性别平等产生重要影响。
Are academic articles written by men and women in high-impact medical journals cited differently? In this cross-sectional study of 5554 articles, those written by women primary or senior authors had fewer citations than those written by men primary or senior authors. Articles written by women as both primary and senior authors had approximately half the number of citations as those authored by men as both primary and senior authors. These findings suggest that gender-based differences in article citations may be a key contributor to disparities in the advancement and promotion of women in academic medicine. This cross-sectional study evaluates whether academic articles in high-impact medical journals written by men and women are cited differently. Women are less likely to be promoted and hold leadership positions in academic medicine. How often academic articles are cited is a key measure of scholarly impact and frequently assessed for professional advancement; however, it is unknown whether peer-reviewed articles written by men and women are cited differently. To evaluate whether academic articles from high-impact medical journals written by men and women are cited differently. In this cross-sectional study of all original research and commentary articles from 5 high-impact medical journals (Annals of Internal Medicine, British Medical Journal, JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, and The New England Journal of Medicine) from 2015 to 2018, the gender of the primary and senior authors of each article were identified using an online database, and the number of times each article has been cited was identified using Web of Science. The number of citations by primary and senior author gender were then compared. Data were analyzed from July 2020 to April 2021. Primary and senior authors’ genders. Number of citations per article. Among 5554 articles, women wrote 1975 (35.6%) as primary author and 1273 of 4940 (25.8%) as senior author. Original research articles written by women as primary authors had fewer median (interquartile range) citations than articles written by men as primary authors (36 [17-82] citations vs 54 [22-141] citations; P < .001) and senior authors (37 [17-93] citations vs 51 [20-128] citations; P < .001). Articles written by women as both primary and senior authors had approximately half as many median (interquartile range) citations as those authored by men as both primary and senior authors (33 [15-68] citations vs 59 [23-149] citations; P < .001). Differences in citations remained in each year of the study and were less pronounced among commentary articles. In this study, articles written by women in high-impact medical journals had fewer citations than those written by men, particularly when women wrote together as primary and senior authors. These differences may have important consequences for the professional success of women and achieving gender equity in academic medicine.
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.009
发表时间: 2018-07-01
期刊: RESEARCH POLICY
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Lerchenmueller, Marc J.;Sorenson, Olav
通讯作者: Sorenson, Olav
DOI: 10.1037/arc0000069
发表时间: 2019-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
Melnikoff, David E;Valian, Virginia V
通讯作者: Valian, Virginia V
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10680
发表时间: 2015-09-15
期刊: JAMA
影响因子: --
作者:
Jena AB;Khullar D;Ho O;Olenski AR;Blumenthal DM
通讯作者: Blumenthal DM
DOI: 10.1056/nejmsa053910
发表时间: 2006-07-20
影响因子: 158.5
作者:
Jagsi, Reshma;Guancial, Elizabeth A.;Hylek, Elaine M.
通讯作者: Hylek, Elaine M.
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23569
发表时间: 2013-01-01
期刊: LARYNGOSCOPE
影响因子: 2.6
作者:
Svider, Peter F.;Choudhry, Zaid A.;Eloy, Jean Anderson
通讯作者: Eloy, Jean Anderson