Discordance in chromosomal and self-reported sex in the UK Biobank: Implications for transgender- and intersex-inclusive data collection.
Discordance in chromosomal and self-reported sex in the UK Biobank: Implications for transgender- and intersex-inclusive data collection.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.2218700120
复制
发表时间:
2023-05-02
影响因子:
11.1
通讯作者:
Duchowny, Kate A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ackley, Sarah F.;Zimmerman, Scott C.;Flatt, Jason D.;Riley, Alicia R.;Sevelius, Jae;Duchowny, Kate A.
Despite recent calls to distinguish between sex and gender, these constructs are often assessed in isolation or are used interchangeably. Our study quantifies the disagreement between chromosomal and self-reported sex and identifies potential reasons for discordance using data from the UK Biobank. We show that among approximately 200 individuals with sex discordance, 71% of discordances were explained by intersex traits or transgender identity. These findings imply that health and clinical researchers have a unique opportunity to advance the rigor of scientific research as well as the health and well-being of transgender, intersex, and nonbinary people, who have long been excluded from and overlooked in clinical and survey research. There is growing need to distinguish between sex and gender. While sex is assigned at birth, gender is socially constructed and may not correspond to one’s assigned sex. However, in most research studies, sex or gender is assessed in isolation or the terms are used interchangeably, which has implications for research accuracy and inclusivity. We used data from the UK Biobank to quantify the prevalence of disagreement between chromosomal and self-reported sex and identify potential reasons for discordance. Among approximately 200 individuals with sex discordance, 71% of discordances were potentially explained by the presence of intersex traits or transgender identity. The findings indicate that when describing sex- and/or gender-specific differences in health, researchers may be limited in their ability to draw conclusions regarding specific sex and/or gender health information.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Bycroft C;Freeman C;Petkova D;Band G;Elliott LT;Sharp K;Motyer A;Vukcevic D;Delaneau O;O'Connell J;Cortes A;Welsh S;Young A;Effingham M;McVean G;Leslie S;Allen N;Donnelly P;Marchini J
通讯作者:
Marchini J
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
Meerwijk, Esther L.;Sevelius, Jae M.
通讯作者:
Sevelius, Jae M.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Lagos, Danya
通讯作者:
Lagos, Danya
影响因子:
6.8
作者:
Marioni RE;Harris SE;Zhang Q;McRae AF;Hagenaars SP;Hill WD;Davies G;Ritchie CW;Gale CR;Starr JM;Goate AM;Porteous DJ;Yang J;Evans KL;Deary IJ;Wray NR;Visscher PM
通讯作者:
Visscher PM
影响因子:
4.7
作者:
Kcomt, Luisa;Gorey, Kevin M.;McCabe, Sean Esteban
通讯作者:
McCabe, Sean Esteban