CT-optimized skin stroking delivered by hand or robot is comparable.

CT-optimized skin stroking delivered by hand or robot is comparable.
复制标题

DOI:
10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00208
复制
发表时间:
2013
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Croy I
Croy I
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Triscoli C;Olausson H;Sailer U;Ignell H;Croy I

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

前言:我们研究的目的是调查人工产生的令人愉悦的触觉刺激是否与机械源产生的类似触觉刺激在质量上具有可比性。方法:采用重复测量设计,在4种不同条件下对31例受试者进行测试[男性16例,女性15例,年龄24.5±2.6岁,均数和标准差(SD)]。机器人或手以三种不同的速度(0.3、3和30厘米/秒)在前臂多毛的皮肤上进行令人愉快的抚摸式笔触。在两种情况下,受试者被告知中风的来源,而在另外两种不同的情况下,他们没有被告知。在刺激之后,受试者被要求对每种触觉的愉悦度和强度进行评分。结果:在两种情况下,愉快度评分始终是非常相似的。无论受试者是否被告知正在发生的中风的来源,这一结果都是在刺激速度下发现的。相比之下,在手持条件下,两种较慢的速度的强度评级明显更高,但对于最快的速度则没有。结论:由于机器人和人类的触摸在感知愉悦性方面具有高度可比性,因此手持刺激可以用于机器人刺激不适用的触摸快感研究(例如儿童或某些身体部位)。
Introduction: The aim of our study was to investigate whether a pleasant tactile stimulation which is manually produced is qualitatively comparable to an analogous tactile stimulation produced instead by a mechanical source. Methods: Thirty-one subjects [16 men, 15 women, 24.5 ± 2.6 years, mean, and standard deviation (SD)] were tested under four different conditions in a repeated measurements design. A pleasant caress-like brush stroke on the hairy skin of the forearm was either produced by a robot or by hand with three different velocities (0.3, 3, and 30 cm/s). In two conditions the subjects were informed about the stroke's source, whereas in two different conditions they were not. Subsequent to the stimulation, the subjects were asked to rate both pleasantness and intensity of each tactile sensation. Results: Consistently, pleasantness ratings were very similar in both conditions. This was found across stimulus velocities and regardless of whether the subjects were informed about the source of the on-going stroke or not. In contrast, intensity ratings were significantly higher in the handheld condition for the two slower velocities, but not for the fastest one. Conclusion: As robot and human touch are highly comparable in terms of perceived pleasantness, handheld stimulation may be used in studies of touch hedonia where robot stimulation is not applicable (for instance in children or certain body parts).
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.015
发表时间: 2008-05-09
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Olausson, Hakan W.;Cole, Jonathan;Bushnell, M. Catherine
通讯作者: Bushnell, M. Catherine
DOI: 10.1162/089892999563607
发表时间: 1999-09-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Blakemore, SJ;Frith, CD;Wolpert, DM
通讯作者: Wolpert, DM
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-24
发表时间: 2013-06-01
期刊: BMC oral health
影响因子: 2.9
作者:
Sanzone, Lauren A;Lee, Jessica Y;Vann, William F Jr
通讯作者: Vann, William F Jr
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00051
发表时间: 2012
影响因子: 3
作者:
Ackerley R;Hassan E;Curran A;Wessberg J;Olausson H;McGlone F
通讯作者: McGlone F
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsn005
发表时间: 2008-06-01
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
McCabe, Ciara;Rolls, Edmund T.;McGlone, Francis
通讯作者: McGlone, Francis