Representation of Partisan, Territorial, and Institutional Interests in Second Chambers: Evidence from the German Bundesrat and its Committees

Representation of Partisan, Territorial, and Institutional Interests in Second Chambers: Evidence from the German Bundesrat and its Committees
复制标题

第二院中党派、领土和机构利益的代表:来自德国联邦参议院及其委员会的证据

DOI:
10.1093/publius/pjz032
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Publius: The Journal of Federalism
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Roland Sturm
Roland Sturm
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Patrick;Markus M. Müller;Antonios Souris ;Roland Sturm

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文回顾了联邦第二议院关于利益代表性的长期争论,探讨了党派偏见维斯领土和其他利益(如机构问题)的影响。我们认为,委员会作为政策和决策的实际场所,提供了一个指导性的方法来理解利益代表在第二个议院,就像在第一个议院。对于我们研究的实证部分,我们专注于德国联邦参议院及其委员会。根据他们的会议协议,我们开发了一个新的数据集,其中包含超过51,000张唱名投票的信息,这是有史以来研究联邦参议院利益代表和决策的最大实证基础。最重要的是,我们发现党派之争发挥了作用,但作用不大。代表们将个人或共同的次国家利益置于其政党关系之上,就像联邦共和国的创始人在德国宪法中所设想的那样。
Revisiting the longstanding debate on interest representation in federal second chambers, this article investigates the influence of partisanship vis-à-vis territorial and other interests such as institutional concerns on deliberations. We argue that committees as the actual place of policy- and decision-making provide an instructive approach to understand interest representation in second chambers, just as in first chambers. For the empirical part of our study, we focus on the GermanBundesratand its committees. Based on the protocols of their meetings, we developed a new dataset that contains information on more than 51,000 roll call votes, the largest-ever empirical basis to study interest representation and decision-making in theBundesrat. Above all, we find that partisanship plays a role, yet a minor one. The representatives prioritize individual or joint sub-state interests over their political party affiliations, just like the founding fathers of the Federal Republic have envisaged it in the German constitution.
DOI: 10.1080/13572330600738845
发表时间: 2006-01-01
影响因子: 1
作者:
Kern, Holger Lutz;Hainmueller, Jens
通讯作者: Hainmueller, Jens
德国联邦国家的组成部分:德国联邦共和国政治制度中的统治制度和自治制度
DOI: --
发表时间: 2000
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
G. Lehmbruch
通讯作者: G. Lehmbruch
DOI: 10.1093/0198295650.001.0001
发表时间: 2001
期刊: The Journal of Legislative Studies
影响因子: --
作者:
R. Elgie
通讯作者: R. Elgie
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-07791-6_3
发表时间: 2000
期刊: The Journal of Legislative Studies
影响因子: --
作者:
Wolfgang Renzsch
通讯作者: Wolfgang Renzsch
管理大联盟:德国 2005–09
DOI: 10.1080/09644008.2010.515776
发表时间: 2010
期刊: German Politics
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
B. Miller;W. Müller
通讯作者: W. Müller