A quantitative spatial comparison of high-density diffuse optical tomography and fMRI cortical mapping.
A quantitative spatial comparison of high-density diffuse optical tomography and fMRI cortical mapping.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.124
复制
发表时间:
2012-07-16
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Culver, Joseph P.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Eggebrecht, Adam T.;White, Brian R.;Ferradal, Silvina L.;Chen, Chunxiao;Zhan, Yuxuan;Snyder, Abraham Z.;Dehghani, Hamid;Culver, Joseph P.
Functional neuroimaging commands a dominant role in current neuroscience research. However its use in bedside clinical and certain neuro-scientific studies has been limited because the current tools lack the combination of being non-invasive, non-ionizing and portable while maintaining moderate resolution and localization accuracy. Optical neuroimaging satisfies many of these requirements, but, until recent advances in high-density diffuse optical tomography (HD-DOT), has been hampered by limited resolution. While early results of HD-DOT have been promising, a quantitative voxel-wise comparison and validation of HD-DOT against the gold standard of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been lacking. Herein, we provide such an analysis within the visual cortex using matched visual stimulation protocols in a single group of subjects (n=5) during separate HD-DOT and fMRI scanning sessions. To attain the needed voxel-to-voxel co-registration between HD-DOT and fMRI image spaces, we implemented subject-specific head modeling that incorporated MRI anatomy, detailed segmentation, and alignment of source and detector positions. Comparisons of the visual responses found an average localization error between HD-DOT and fMRI of 4.4 +/− 1 mm, significantly less than the average distance between cortical gyri. This specificity demonstrates that HD-DOT has sufficient image quality to be useful as a surrogate for fMRI.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Dehghani H;White BR;Zeff BW;Tizzard A;Culver JP
通讯作者:
Culver JP
影响因子:
1.9
作者:
Custo, Anna;Wells, William M., III;Boas, David A.
通讯作者:
Boas, David A.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Felleman, Daniel J.;Van Essen, David C.
通讯作者:
Van Essen, David C.
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Bouchard MB;Chen BR;Burgess SA;Hillman EM
通讯作者:
Hillman EM
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Dale, AM;Fischl, B;Sereno, MI
通讯作者:
Sereno, MI