The Nuanced Relationship Between Creative Cognition and the Interaction Between Executive Functioning and Intelligence

The Nuanced Relationship Between Creative Cognition and the Interaction Between Executive Functioning and Intelligence
复制标题

创造性认知与执行功能和智力之间相互作用之间的微妙关系

DOI:
10.1002/jocb.493
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
The Journal of Creative Behavior
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zaghi, Arash E.
Zaghi, Arash E.
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Taylor, Christa L.;Zaghi, Arash E.

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

目前的研究解决了我们对创造性认知,智力(IQ)和执行功能(EF)之间关系的理解差距。本科生完成了智商测试,言语和图形发散思维(DT)测试,以及EF的自我评估,在四个研究会议。参与者数据(N= 199)进行了分析,使用线性回归和过程调节模型。结果表明,EF与智商相互作用,以不同的方式预测图形和言语DT,不同的DT评分方法会出现不同的模式。使用传统的DT评分,Gf(而不是Gc)显著调节了EF与言语和图形DT任务得分之间的关系。低EF与低Gf患者DT评分降低相关,与相对高Gf患者无关,而与高Gf患者DT评分升高相关。使用独创性比率分数,低EF与低智商(Gf和Gc)者言语DT反应的独创性降低相关,与相对较高智商者无关,而与Gc(而非Gf)分数最高者的独创性增强相关。因此,在EF与IQ相互作用以预测DT的方式中存在一些细微差别。
The current study addresses gaps in our understanding of the relationship between creative cognition, intelligence (IQ), and executive functioning (EF). Undergraduate students completed an IQ test, verbal and figural divergent thinking (DT) tests, and a self‐assessment of EF, across four study sessions. Participant data (N= 199) were analyzed using linear regression and PROCESS moderation models. Results demonstrated that EF interacts with IQ to predict figural and verbal DT in distinct ways, with different patterns emerging from different methods of scoring DT. Using traditional DT scoring,Gf(but notGc) significantly moderated the relationship between EF and scores on both verbal and figural DT tasks. Low EF was associated with diminished DT scores for those with lowGfscores, unrelated for those with relatively higherGf, and enhanced scores for those with the highestGf. Using originality ratio scores, low EF was associated with diminished originality in verbal DT responses for those with low IQ (bothGfandGc), unrelated for those with relatively higher IQ, and enhanced originality for those with the highestGc(but notGf) scores. Thus, there are several nuances in the way that EF interacts with IQ to predict DT.
DOI: 10.1002/per.572
发表时间: 2006-03-01
影响因子: 5.9
作者:
Burch, GS;Hemsley, DR;Corr, PJ
通讯作者: Corr, PJ
维度精神病理学测量与创造性成就或发散性思维有关吗?
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01029
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Zabelina,DaryaL;Condon,David;Beeman,Mark
通讯作者: Beeman,Mark
注意力和创造力。
DOI: 10.1017/9781316556238.010
发表时间: 2018
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Darya L. Zabelina
通讯作者: Darya L. Zabelina
智力和创造力:复杂但重要的关系
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
J. Plucker;Amber Esping
通讯作者: Amber Esping
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1730
发表时间: 2006-10-01
影响因子: 17.7
作者:
Biederman, Joseph;Petty, Carter;Faraone, Stephen V.
通讯作者: Faraone, Stephen V.