A guilt-free strategy increases self-reported non-compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures: Experimental evidence from 12 countries.
A guilt-free strategy increases self-reported non-compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures: Experimental evidence from 12 countries.
复制标题
无罪策略增加了自我报告的不合规，与COVID-19的预防措施：来自12个国家的实验证据。
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0249914
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Stegmueller D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Daoust JF;Bélanger É;Dassonneville R;Lachapelle E;Nadeau R;Becher M;Brouard S;Foucault M;Hönnige C;Stegmueller D
对公民遵守COVID-19预防措施的研究通常依赖于调查数据。虽然这些数据是必不可少的，但公共卫生限制提供了明确的信号，表明在这种情况下什么是社会所希望的，从而在自我报告的遵守措施中产生了反应偏差的潜在来源。在这项研究中，我们研究了最近提出的减轻这种限制的无内疚策略的结果是否在12个国家中具有普遍性，以及治疗效果是否因亚组而异。我们的研究结果表明，无负罪感策略在每个国家都是一个有用的工具，使受访者报告不遵守行为的倾向增加了9至16个百分点。这种影响适用于基于性别、年龄和教育的不同亚群体。我们的结论是，纳入这一战略应该是调查研究的新标准，旨在提供有关当前流行病的关键数据。
Studies of citizens’ compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures routinely rely on survey data. While such data are essential, public health restrictions provide clear signals of what is socially desirable in this context, creating a potential source of response bias in self-reported measures of compliance. In this research, we examine whether the results of a guilt-free strategy recently proposed to lessen this constraint are generalizable across twelve countries, and whether the treatment effect varies across subgroups. Our findings show that the guilt-free strategy is a useful tool in every country included, increasing respondents’ proclivity to report non-compliance by 9 to 16 percentage points. This effect holds for different subgroups based on gender, age and education. We conclude that the inclusion of this strategy should be the new standard for survey research that aims to provide crucial data on the current pandemic.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.2012520117
发表时间：
2020-11-03
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Galasso, Vincenzo;Pons, Vincent;Foucault, Martial
通讯作者：
Foucault, Martial
影响因子：
29.9
作者：
West, Robert;Michie, Susan;Amlot, Richard
通讯作者：
Amlot, Richard
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Holtgraves, T;Eck, J;Lasky, B
通讯作者：
Lasky, B
影响因子：
1.8
作者：
Mutz, Diana C.;Pemantle, Robin;Pham, Philip
通讯作者：
Pham, Philip
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Höglinger M;Jann B
通讯作者：
Jann B