Intentional action processing across the transition to crawling: Does the experience of self-locomotion impact infants' understanding of intentional actions?
Intentional action processing across the transition to crawling: Does the experience of self-locomotion impact infants' understanding of intentional actions?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101470
复制
发表时间：
2020-08
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Moty K
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brandone AC;Stout W;Moty K
婴儿期的运动发育里程碑，如向自我运动的过渡，对婴儿的社交和认知发展具有连锁影响。目前的研究旨在通过探索爬行经验是否以及如何影响婴儿时期实现的一个关键的社会认知里程碑：意向行为理解的发展，来增加这一文献。研究1采用横断面、年龄恒定的设计来检验运动婴儿(n=36)和运动前期婴儿(n=36)处理意向性到达动作失败的能力是否不同。研究2(n=124)通过评估运动婴儿经验的可变性如何映射到他们失败的有意动作理解的可变性来进一步探讨这个问题。这两项研究还评估了婴儿参与三元互动的倾向，以阐明自我移动是否直接或间接地通过改变婴儿与社会伙伴的互动来影响意图行为的理解。总而言之，结果没有证据表明自我运动在发展意向行为理解中所起的作用。运动型和运动前运动型婴儿在失败动作理解或三元参与水平上没有差异(研究1)，在爬行体验天数、游戏中爬行倾向和最大爬行速度上的个体差异未能预测婴儿的有意动作理解或三元参与(研究2)。对这些无效发现的解释以及对故意行为理解发展的替代影响被考虑在内。
Motor developmental milestones in infancy, such as the transition to self-locomotion, have cascading implications for infants’ social and cognitive development. The current studies aimed to add to this literature by exploring whether and how crawling experience impacts a key social-cognitive milestone achieved in infancy: the development of intentional action understanding. Study 1 used a cross-sectional, age-held-constant design to examine whether locomotor (n = 36) and prelocomotor (n = 36) infants differ in their ability to process a failed intentional reaching action. Study 2 (n = 124) further probed this question by assessing how variability in locomotor infants’ experience maps onto variability in their failed intentional action understanding. Both studies also assessed infants’ tendency to engage in triadic interactions to shed light on whether self-locomotion impacts intentional action understanding directly or indirectly via changes in infants’ interactions with social partners. Altogether, results showed no evidence for the role of self-locomotion in the development of intentional action understanding. Locomotor and prelocomotor infants did not differ in their failed action understanding or levels of triadic engagement (Study 1) and individual differences in days of crawling experience, propensity to crawl during play, and maximum crawling speed failed to predict infants’ intentional action understanding or triadic engagement (Study 2). Explanations for these null findings and alternative influences on the development of intentional action understanding are considered.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Brand, Rebecca J.;Escobar, Kelly;Albu, Amanda
通讯作者：
Albu, Amanda
DOI：
10.1080/15248372.2012.710863
发表时间：
2014-01-01
期刊：
Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society
影响因子：
--
作者：
Dunphy-Lelii S;Labounty J;Lane JD;Wellman HM
通讯作者：
Wellman HM
看与被看 婴儿与看护人在自由运动游戏中的社交观察
影响因子：
3.7
作者：
Franchak, John M.;Kretch, Kari S.;Adolph, Karen E.
通讯作者：
Adolph, Karen E.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Behne, T;Carpenter, M;Tomasello, M
通讯作者：
Tomasello, M
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Clearfield, Melissa W.;Osborne, Christine N.;Mullen, Molly
通讯作者：
Mullen, Molly