Critical comparison of image analysis workflows for quantitative cell morphological evaluation in assessing cell response to biomaterials
Critical comparison of image analysis workflows for quantitative cell morphological evaluation in assessing cell response to biomaterials
复制标题
用于定量细胞形态学评估的图像分析工作流程的批判性比较,以评估细胞对生物材料的反应
作者:
K. Ravikumar;Sven P. Voigt;S. Kalidindi;B. Basu
Quantitative image analysis is an important tool in understanding cell fate processes through the study of cell morphological changes in terms of size, shape, number, and orientation. In this context, this work explores systematically the main challenges involved in the quantitative analysis of fluorescence microscopy images and also proposes a new protocol while comparing its outcome with the widely used ImageJ analysis. It is important to mention that fluorescence microscopy is by far most widely used in biocompatibility analysis (observing cell fate changes) of implantable biomaterials. In this study, we employed two different image analyses toolsets: (a) the conventionally employed ImageJ software, and (b) a recently developed automated digital image analyses framework, called ImageMKS. While ImageJ offers a powerful toolset for image analyses, it requires sophisticated user expertise to design and iteratively refine the analyses workflow. This workflow primarily comprises a sequence of image transformations that typically involve de-noising and labeling of features. On the other hand, ImageMKS automates the image analyses protocol to a large extent, and thereby mitigates the influence of the user bias on the final results. This aspect is addressed using a case study of C2C12 mouse myoblast cells grown on poly(vinylidene difluoride) (PVDF) based polymeric substrates. In particular, we used a number of fluorescence microscopy images of these mouse myoblasts grown on PVDF-based nanobiocomposites under the influence of electric field. In addition to the MKS workflows requiring much less user time because of their automation, it was observed that ImageMKS workflows consistently produced more reliable results that correlated better with the previously reported experimental studies.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.2217/nnm.12.204
发表时间:
2013-11
期刊:
Nanomedicine (London, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Crowder SW;Liang Y;Rath R;Park AM;Maltais S;Pintauro PN;Hofmeister W;Lim CC;Wang X;Sung HJ
通讯作者:
Sung HJ
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Serena E;Figallo E;Tandon N;Cannizzaro C;Gerecht S;Elvassore N;Vunjak-Novakovic G
通讯作者:
Vunjak-Novakovic G
影响因子:
19
作者:
Driscoll MK;Danuser G
通讯作者:
Danuser G
DOI:
10.1039/c0ib00016g
发表时间:
2010-08
期刊:
Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wan LQ;Kang SM;Eng G;Grayson WL;Lu XL;Huo B;Gimble J;Guo XE;Mow VC;Vunjak-Novakovic G
通讯作者:
Vunjak-Novakovic G
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Lamprecht, Michael R.;Sabatini, David M.;Carpenter, Anne E.
通讯作者:
Carpenter, Anne E.